“HRW才發表了一份報告，揭露中國透過「一體化聯合作戰平台」App，針對新疆進行嚴密的生活監控，包含居家出入次數太少、人際關係疏離、甚至家庭用電超量，一舉一動都被視為「可疑活動」的指標。這套作戰App以「反恐」名義，在新疆進行全面的官民雙向監控。”
華為在中國數位監控方面的角色:
"《華盛頓郵報》對3000張華為的PPT簡報進行分析，發現華為在追踪中國民眾方面發揮的作用比原先承認的還要廣泛。
報導稱，這些PPT簡報去年底發佈在華為官網，揭露華為在中國5大主要監控行動所發揮的作用，包括華為透過其技術協助中共當局以聲音識別個人、監獄監控、跟蹤感興趣的政治人物，以及監控新疆再教育營和囚犯的勞動計劃，同時也幫助零售商使用人臉識別追踪消費者。
在錄音分析部分，華為與中國人工智能公司科大訊飛共同開發的科大訊飛聲紋管理平台，協助當局出於國家安全目的分析錄音，以聲音與聲紋的大數據識別個人。
在監獄和看守所監控部分，華為則與另一家中國公司Shanghai Hewei Technology共同開發的綜合監獄監控系統。
此外，華為的監控系統還能夠透過精確定位、使用人臉識別監控攝影機進行跟踪等措施，幫助中共追踪有興趣的政治人物和犯罪嫌疑人，以及新疆地區的監控等等。"
這篇提供時間點及實際參與的子公司:
"華郵檢視的逾百份文件、超過三千頁的行銷簡報，許多標示「保密」，文件標註日期從二○一六到一八年，多數檔案建立時間標記為二○一四年九月廿三日，最後一批修改時間在一九、二○年，這些檔案去年已從華為官網撤下，但其中若干監視產品直到本月都還列在華為的網路目錄上，或者是在政府今年的採購文件或專利申請文件中。
簡報內容顯示，華為推銷其技術可如何協助政府，利用聲音辨識身分、監控政治對象、管理意識形態再教育活動，和遭監禁者的勞動等。一八年的一份簡報顯示「國防安全，語音聲紋庫管理平台應用場景」，展示該公司與中國人工智慧公司「科大訊飛」（iFlytek）合作開發的「iFlytek聲紋管理平台」，可比對目標對象聲紋，鑑別其身分。科大訊飛一九年被美國商務部列入侵犯新疆維吾爾族人權的廿八家實體制裁黑名單。"
華郵報導將華為在各領域產品的配合方式寫得非常清楚，從這個案例看，台灣應該在相關軟硬體全面禁用中國產品才對:
[ This marketing presentation shows Huawei pitching its technology to assist authorities in analyzing voice recordings for national security purposes. (The term “national security” is broad in China, encompassing political dissent, religious gatherings, Hong Kong and Taiwan policy, ethnic relations and economic stability.)
This presentation, dated 2018, introduces the “iFlytek Voiceprint Management Platform,” co-developed by Huawei and iFlytek, a Chinese artificial-intelligence company. The system can identify individuals by comparing the sound of their voice against a large database of recorded “voiceprints.”
The slide above shows a first step to “extract or obtain the voice audio of the target,” without details of how that is accomplished. Another slide lists audio from “phone recordings” and “smartphone apps” as inputs. It’s unclear from the presentation if Huawei and iFlytek are involved in obtaining the voice audio or if the customer obtains it. IFlytek didn’t respond to questions. ]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/12/14/huawei-surveillance-china/
即使在最新出現的阿拉伯聯合大公國與美國之F-35軍機買賣僵局中，也能見到理由之一是因華為涉入阿聯基礎通訊設施而有所顧忌:
"The U.S. has also long been concerned about Abu Dhabi’s entanglement with Chinese telecommunications company Huawei Technologies Co., which provides the country with its communications infrastructure. U.S. officials and members of Congress say Huawei is a national-security threat, concerned that the Chinese government could use the privately held company’s gear, embedded in telecom networks world-wide, to spy or disrupt communications. The company and the Chinese government have denied such allegations."
補台媒的摘要報導:
"報導說，該交易規模達230億美元（6404億台幣），內容包括採購美製F-35戰鬥機、「死神」（Reaper）無人機以及其他先進武器，阿聯此舉顯示，這兩個長期盟邦間的關係，因對中國在波灣的角色分歧而出現重大動搖。"
用澳洲軍艦案換阿聯大公國軍機案的好處是既安撫法國不滿又解決阿聯親中疑慮，且澳洲取得核武技術的後果遠比中國取得戰機技術的後果要來得令人放心:
"While the Rafales are potentially planned as long-term replacements for the Mirage 2000-9 fleet, that still leaves the service with F-16E/F Block 60 Desert Falcons, too, meaning that procurement of the F-35 is not necessarily an urgent issue. The original plans had called for the first F-35s to be delivered to the UAE in 2027 and there are ongoing upgrade programs to keep the F-16 and Mirage fleets viable until well beyond that date."
中東國家沒體認到的一點是: 想從兩虎相爭裡獲利，老虎們通常更偏好用利齒而非皮毛取得從屬者的順服。
[ "US pressure has intensified in recent years, and especially since the start of the Belt and Road Initiative in 2013," said Tin Hinane El Kadi, an associate fellow at the think tank Chatham House. "However, in international politics, you can only pressure countries when you have substantive power and the means to really offer another deal."
She added: "If the US really wants to pressure countries and win this so-called new cold war, it would have to move away from discursive play, and really start to put real projects, and some real cash on the table," ]
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/12/27/middleeast/china-middle-east-uae-analysis-cmd-intl/index.html