本次釋憲白話重點:
"判決書指出,當代民主社會的事實性資訊提供者,無論是媒體或一般人,均應負有一定程度的真實查證義務,而不得恣意散播不實或真假難辨的資訊於眾,助長假新聞、假訊息肆意流竄,導致顛覆自由言論市場的事實根基。"
看來手法更細膩了:
"Beijing’s disinformation strategy continues to shift. Fact checkers noted that Chinese agents were no longer distracted by pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong, as they were during the last presidential election in Taiwan. Now, they have access to artificial intelligence that can generate images, audio and video — “potentially a dream come true for Chinese propagandists,” said Nathan Beauchamp-Mustafaga, a RAND researcher.
台灣事實核查中心上月稱,從2020到2022年,直接涉及中國和台灣關係的不實信息減少了。中國代理人轉而更多地側重通過傳播有關當地服務和健康問題的謊言,煽動台灣社會的內部分歧。專家稱,有時一些關於醫療救助和名人緋聞的可疑帖文會引導觀眾去關注台灣政治相關的陰謀論。"
https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20231127/taiwan-china-disinformation/zh-hant/dual/