Follow

long, RMS, civil rights, freedom, hypocrisy 

@_xhr_
@rumpelsepp

This implication is simply bullshit.

I don't agree with on almost anything (not even the definition of free software which I consider too mild with corporations abuse).

But what happened at @fsf is disgusting.

Software is a form of expression.

Now we have the paradox of forcing to resign for what he said. Not for anything he did, any crime he committed. Not as an effect of a due process.

Just for what he said.

The international crowd of cowards that lynched him over the should lobby to get UN to institute an universal law on so that will know which opinions cannot be expressed and will have the right to defend themselves in a court.

That's the final step to turn into an actual evolutive advantage. I mean: at least people like don't say what they DO!

Meanwhile what happened to Stallman shows that nobody really care about Universal Human Rights. Nobody ever read nor understood them. I think you should really read them twice. In particular articles 18, 19 and 12.

If you attack a man instead of his arguments, you might defeat the man but not the arguments.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.