Follow

@zacchiro

Very nice text.

There is a issue through.

Tomorrow will release 1.0, an definition that will magically turn any trained on unshareable data into !

As far as I have been able to understand about the co-design process, it was intended to open a loophole in the , to benefit OSI sponsors such as , , and so on..

But if you read your Aspirational text while taking the OSAID in mind, you see how its loophole affect your aspirations too, as your text talks about "FOSS", and any black box trained over unshareable data will qualify both as valid input and as valid output.

So I think that @civodul's proposal is the only viable one to achieve your aspirations, as it would be tainted by proprietary black boxes anyway, thanks to OSAID, don't you think?

· Edited · · 0 · 2 · 2
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.