昨晚睡前突然想起沈墨,之前觉得这个角色没被演得出彩很大原因是演员的锅,但也讲不出更细节的东西,昨天突然想到其实可能演员之外,故事的背景烘托也做得不够好。
观众能推出沈墨身上有故事,线索是她对王阳说不出具体然的拒绝,这也是演员被诟病最大的地方。但其实,要凸显沈墨身上的撕裂感,真要大手笔烘托的是大爷出场之后的情节,但大爷对她令人不适的“照顾”吧,有是有,但讲得太暧昧不明了,他们俩之间最直面“对儿童/青少年的性暴力”这个问题的场景是用皮带抽打沈墨,但就连那个场景也避开了可能包含性意味的姿势和部位,甚至到马德胜私自讯问大爷,也只能看到两个成年人心知肚明地绕着问题核心摆阵,不敢明说,只感啰嗦。一直到最后,最后只有全男性在场的客观“案情描述”时和只有两个女性的场景之下,强奸、虐童才被真的点明。
I wanted to apologize to anyone who may have mistaken my pronouns in my profile as an intent to mock the use of pronouns.
The intent was always that I am happy to use whatever pronouns a person wishes that they feel best represents respect shown to them. Likewise I asked for pronouns to be used for me that also shows respect. It was intended to be a two way street not a mockery.
I have since added a note to my profile to make it quite clear my pronouns are not intended to mock.
流动的人