NotHelpfulUntilIAm🥤 🌛 🗄️ @admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org

@daswarkeinhuhn Put tarrifs on bear, now lacking bear. Please advise.

@CorvidCrone From what you toot, this might be the quality your company produces on your day off:

@renardboy Interesting, i didn't have it on my radar that russia exported potash

@molosovsky Wünsche dir ein friedliches, schönes offline.

@Sven_Holger_Wolf Ob die einen Platz haben, der so ähnlich wie "Tiananmen" heißt?

@greegreehoist So this https://what-if.xkcd.com/20/ is what i initially thought of, in the last scenario we would have to be a bit to the side to have any chance of experiencing anything it seems.

But it is not very intricate, so this https://what-if.xkcd.com/141/ might be more romantic, involving different kinds of effects and also the moon.

In any case, both seem much more peaceful than what is currently happening, so i hope it enhances your meditation experience!

@vriska You have to do this manually? Wow, i'd be like 13 now because i would keep forgetting.

@greegreehoist Hmm, the details about asteroid hit scenarios on https://what-if.xkcd.com/ (including when and what one would experience of the other side) were very interesting. Don't wanna browse the massive archive to fish it out right now since i'm about to go to sleep, but if you're interested i'll do that.

Would scienctific knowledge improve the experience? That i don't know.

Definitely the kind of normal i like.

@CorvidCrone If you could only automate this, it would be such a timesaver!

@Lockdownyourlife Hope not because of my silly joke, but in any case i wish you a peaceful offline.

@VeroniqueB99 Those spring people, can't stand them. Always slinking down the stairs and then they expect you to carry them up again!

@Lockdownyourlife I hope they at least payed on time.

@soundconjurer @VeroniqueB99 It'll be a good thing. Reduces the jerks, you know? Some things are just not meant to be enjoyed raw.

@VeroniqueB99 At least we've finally reached the point where we can finish it by putting it into the oven!

@light I'm not entirely sure if it was you complaining about "egg cracking", please disregard if i mixed you up with someone else here.

I came upon https://i.imgur.com/KVPHMDf.png inside of this https://imgur.com/gallery/images-of-note-doink-4pAuhAK dump. Might be a good feeling for you that there are trans and queer people denouncing this.

@CorvidCrone Ah, the standard to not expect people to read things that are not available i just assumed.

@catsalad So someone with one butt that kills people would be an assin, and someone without butt that kills people an in.
I wonder if linkedin should rework their brand. Or maybe check if that link is a viable substitute for a butt?

@CorvidCrone I know way too little about you to say anything with confidence, so this is just some random thought that might be relevant or way off:

Might people be intimidated by your precision regarding side aspects and then go into an avoidance stance?

@CorvidCrone I see no functional difference between a generally available instructional text and a personal message. The part i was seeing as important was "available, acknowledged, pretended to be honored but that was a lie". So sorry for being imprecise, but did it actually change the meaning?

@CorvidCrone > I expect coworkers to provide enough information to process their requests
Ok, this part in particular i can understand to be difficult. I needed some time myself to do that part right.
If your coworkers don't even try, though, then the standard they don't hold would be to try to find a way to productively cooperate, a way worse problem imho.

The text message gaslighting sounds particularly bad, another for the "not trying to productively cooperate" category.

So no, no high standards at all. Anything less (provided that a reasonable timespan for improvement is given) and stuff just won't work. Which i would interpret as "we want this company to fail", a reasonable stance if there is UBI and the service is not fulfilling a basic human need.