NOS 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U @admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org

@VeroniqueB99 Well, i thought about burning it all down for a change, but if a group that has restraint gains wold domination, that might be just as well.

@VeroniqueB99 sounds exhausting, is there some kind of automation available?

@VeroniqueB99 So the practice is perfect, and now a new goal can be set? What could such a goal be?

@cjerrington Is it coming from behind? I'd prefer it to come from all sides, so every day has weekend around it.

@Lapizistik Naja, verboten oder nicht, bis 1945 war so einiges nicht verboten, sogar direkt erlaubt oder erforderlich, was man doch so gar nicht möchte.

Zu überlegen, was ethisch korrekt ist, da würde ich lieber ran. Und das sollte nun auch die Interaktionen mit den extremen Ansichten etwas verändern.

@girlonthenet Now where did i put my Luigi Board?

@girlonthenet Luckily we are not laughing at the people but at the great delivery in the video. Preganté!

@avatter Ja komisch, so wenig Fachkräfte, aber viel verdienen tut man auch nicht. Vielleicht besser mal nicht arbeiten und warten bis die magische Hand des Markts uns auch freiträgt?

Observation #1: getting http 500 often when posting a reply
Observation #2: i get quite a bit of notifications that turn out to be "..."

Is the conclusion that #1 happens to a lot of people and they delete the duplicates when http 500 meant success?

@rgm null action is the best!

@padraig I wish you a joyful minimalist trip tomorrow!

@joe Understandable, but reading emails happens to the best of us. Don't take it too seriously!

@ErikUden Minor thing, it's "raygun", not "reagon".
I sure hope that it does not hit me...

@Hyolobrika Damn, i just saw how many spelling errors i included. I should charge a fee for those, retirement would not be far away then.

@lucy The grass on that block could be offensive to people that starve because of the climate catastrophe. We should check our privileges, which should be possible somewhere in the settings, i think.

@interfluidity @dsquareddigest lf there is an overspecific qualification or a redundant one, i usually ask myself what the thing is that would be the logical alternative.
My preferred example: mild yoghurt. Is there spicy yoghurt? Savoury yoghurt?

For the ruthless example, i would intuitively ask if those tasks can be done in a kind way. This leads me to assume that the ruthless way is unkind, and probably will cause harm as a (ruthlessly ignored) byproduct.

For lethal armed forces, the result is a bit more comical: nonlethal armed forces. Infants with full diapers? Security guards with pool noodles? I think i need a savoury yoghurt to digest this.

Interesting article, by the way.

@PippiPunkstrumpf Beim runterscrollen erst gedacht
"... i achieved that on my own"?

Hihi, auch gut ^^

@Hyolobrika Context thing again... is breaking in bad? Depends on if the system has a clearly unethical purpose. Breaking nazi encryption sounds good, Alan Turing did a good thing.

Is using prepared stuff bad? Not as such, we all depend on tools delivered by others. But one can powertrip and claim faim that is not justified, which would be a reason to critisize.

Otherwise, gatekeeping on the side of the accusers might be the problem.

@PippiPunkstrumpf Unangenehm weil was gepostet wird nichts taugt oder weil grundsatzproblem mit dem hashtag? Bin nich informiert was da gemeint ist ^^

@light This is complicated by some people clinging to partners that are not good for them. Just because two people say they are in a relationship does not automatically mean that they actually fit together.

So while some are comforted, some others get treated in a way that aggravates the problem.