NOS 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U @admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org

@PippiPunkstrumpf @ueberlauch Das muss sowas wie dieser Twilz sein von Otto dem Ottomanen, oder?

Nein Scherz, haben schon eine Erklärung mit Link auf die Seiten dazu, danke auf jeden Fall!

@paco Thank you! (English is fine too)

@PippiPunkstrumpf Da haben wir unsere Antwort - ging ja schnell

@daswarkeinhuhn Ah ja, Furzgeräusch, von feinen Menschen auch "Blähton" genannt. Erfreut mich immer wieder, davon zu hören :-D

Schon interessant, alle reden von Monsterdon, aber niemand erklärt, was das ist

@PippiPunkstrumpf @sofasophia In meinem Kopfkino läuft das gerade so:
"Schick die Mahnung raus, das eilt!"
"Aber an wen?"
"Egal, hauptsache schnell!"
"K (innere kündigung unterschreib und zufälligen adressaufkleber greif)"

@PippiPunkstrumpf Banalität des Bösen gibt es auch in klein

@PippiPunkstrumpf Naja, das "ganz normaler alltag" zusammen mit Uniform und Last getragen als wäre da nichts, die Symbolik passt schon besser find ich. Aber Kunst ist Kunst :-)

@PippiPunkstrumpf Und vor allem so sinnlos. 20 Tacken von allen Betrieben sind ja ein Furz im vergleich zu klein bisschen Reichensteuer.
Ich schlage für die Entscheider da gefüllte Reiskörner als Mittagessen vor. Kommt hin von der Denke her.

@PippiPunkstrumpf Erinnert bisschen an Bad religion - american jesus :-)

@mcc Ah, i think i'm starting to get it...
p -> has a default meaning
p_<x> -> the <x> is an unusual unit

Squashing those together without "_" has problems, so the "_" makes sure you don't have problems with spaces as seperators but parse the whole expression at once.

Hmm, i guess you already solved it ^^
I might not have contributed, but it was interesting :-)

@mcc Hmm, sounds like your actual requirement demands more than one letter. Ofc you could use pPqQ... to give p multiple unit types, but i'd say that won't be readable. Is there anything bad about "<p/t><unittype1/2/3>" as a two letter abbreviation? Compact is good, but if you'd loose necessary information not possible, right?

@mcc Ah, just now getting to your previous toots... masto is a bit problematic here, scroll on and loose the original toot, or answer and possibly miss context. Sorry for the chaotic answer ^^

@mcc My knowledge is very, very dated (like 10 years ago), but scala worked pretty nicely back then. Ofc the fan club can be a bit unpleasant.

@Rockndoll Du meinst die, die nicht gewählt werden?

@mcc Would a DSL be helpful here? It seems like the space between a number and a unit would fit, but i know too little about your other requirements.

@VeroniqueB99 It's so strange to try and sleep under one blanket. Cuddling, cool. But for sleep, one is always a vortex of blanket spooling.

@wortspielfettgesicht Gerade was gesehen von NS-Sprüchen auf AFD-Kränzen. Mal nachgekuckt, was man in den Nachrichten findet, und au weiha, das ist ja dauernd.
Die sollte man mal zurück in deren Parteizentrale treten (also die Kränze).

@Daojoan Sitting in a work meeting, muted, reading your article, grinning slightly.

Oh, there could be productivity, but those thoughts get filtered. It is known to me the unproductive parts of the process are not up for discussion, and why would i get into a fight i lost before it started?

Solitaire or similar low-intensity games can reduce the stress. Give the monkey brain something to do, while still being able to hear your name and respond if called upon.

I think your article is right in general, but i am missing methodology, like SAFe, which can also contribute a lot to organizational bloat.

I'd also like to touch upon capitalisms inner contradiction that arises from productivity gains in manufacturing. I am convinced we don't need all that many people to produce the things we actually want. In a similar vein to how "productivity" tools are pitched, i see a lot of things being made and consumed because the ads work.
Now i'll hazard a guess: there might be more people having at least a vague idea that their financial stability depends on being in this, since the alternative (free time to follow your passions) is unthinkable. The "fundamental rethinking of how we approach work itself" you speak of... it might be more fundamental than you portray it to be. Not just some tools, but the logic of infinite growth. Anything less, i would say, must be a stop-gap measure and not a solution.