NOS 🅰️ ®️ ✝️ U @admitsWrongIfProven@qoto.org

@the_etrain Riddle me this: what is more rare, a sales person communicating well with the implementation people, or a sales person that does not drink heavily given the opportunity to do so for free?

@CorvidCrone Hmm, this is getting interesting.

I classed the medical one as "because hurts others", but yeah, i think i was a bit narrow minded there.

Which leads me to the thought that both that case and the new one (if intending to kill the NFL ceo) would be personal, but that personal is a statistics issue. If many are hurt, some very few responding with violence is just a statistical instead of conscious way of selecting who hurts the most people. Like "slap one person, you are likely to get away with it. Slap millions, one will probably kill you".

In the face of riches being generated by scaling a business model, this could be seen as a natural boundary to predatory business models?

@the_etrain Certain type of? I thought there were only those and those others that shake their heads about that but do the same. Maybe i'm just too young and haven't experienced the art form of communication between sales and development/engineering yet?

@catsalad Some are scary, some are informative, some boring...

But dash cam owners australia has the best curses. Those australians are cute, fucking elf!

@catsalad From indulging car crash videos, you should seek and follow trucks that are extended in some way (crane, tilting mechanism) and then it should be just picking up what falls down.

@CorvidCrone Agreeing on your base (i think?) conclusion that this is not good journalism.

But
> Why would it be more important if the guy was targeting the Black Rock CEO than the published target of the NFL CEO?
is pretty clear: it does make a difference if people are targeted ranked by how much damage they do to others. Random or for personal issues would be normal in the US (i hear), targeted ranked by damage done relevant to the question if there is a revolution going on.

@interfluidity I sincerely doubt that magic is involved beyond good old misdirection.

@interfluidity Do you think that this humble perspective is realistic?

You never once mentioned "control", instead you used "be granted". From what i hear about who i think you mean, i must misinterpret what you mean a lot for that to fit.

@the_etrain I heard that this was no longer true, and some european experimental reactors work (and are just too small for practical usage because experimental).

But knowing microsoft, i would rather bet on them using some nice clean coal to supply energy to a non-sustainable fusion reactor.

@the_etrain I heard that this was no longer true, and some european experimental reactors work (and are just too small for practical usage because experimental).

But knowing microsoft, i would rather bet on them using some nice clean coal to supply energy to a non-sustainable fusion reactor.

@CorvidCrone "We need to confuse these people or they will make too many claims!", haha.

@CorvidCrone It makes a bit more sense now, but should B.) not still have a "agreed _with_ " in there?

If the with can be omitted in that case too, that would be a new thing for me.

@LRRRonEarth (keeping the winnie the pooh meme in my head)

Oh no, LRRR! That's not water you're drinking, that's corporate propaganda!

@CorvidCrone As a non-native english speaker, i am confused about B.)
Can that be grammatically correct? What would be the meaning? Or are you asking for differentiation in the sense of "B.) is wrong"?

@volpeon Use 2-space indentation in the documentation and user stories

@AppleFanboy Good luck for a false alarm

@renardboy Purity is a quality often invoked by nazis... :-P

@geist *Mundwinkel abwisch* Stimmt, ich wollt mal was frühstücken.