It is known that #MyersBriggs has little conclusive scientific backing, though nonetheless it is interesting to see personal change over time.

The first three years I took it, I resulted with #ENFP-A. Then slowly through time I was moving more towards #ENTP and identified for a long time as ENXP.

Then I learnt that there is little scientific backing of many personality tests. Plus I totally ignored portrayal bias. The idea that one chooses the answers to what one wants them to be vs to what they are.

So I based a lot, if not all, my answers on the person I was at best of times, which was when I was intoxicated with alcohol. And for a long time I thought that this is the true nature of the individual. So in my eyes it made logical sense.

Now there is also the association bias, the idea that if you hear/read an emotional neutral text, on average, anyone can assimilate to at least one point. So by human nature being predisposed to the need of fitting in, association bias is one's foe.

Considering one of the prime factors of #MBTI that it's hard to change one's personality and that one is born with it, then getting various results over a set time interval, might say more of how one feels at the given time, then one's actual personality.

Nonetheless I just redid it again and got #INTP-A. At least this result falls align with a lot of my day-to-day actions. Though I am still questioning which other biases are here at play?