(135/200)

Some times one questions how the price of an item was decided on. Like take for example pickles, there are multiple options at the store although they all have basically the same ingredients.

One could claim one is paying extra for the brand. That would be fine if the brand was actually good, though lots of times, I have found the no name brand or store brand is better than some specific big name brand.

Follow

(138/200)

Over the past two days, I was living off of 5min quick make foods meaning one just needs to add hot water, stir, and wait.

Each meal/cup had a dry weight of about 60g and ca 250g wet weight. And it would take about 3 cups to be satiated.

Considering that the price per cup ranged from 0.80-3.50€ and the convenience factor, it can be quite an expensive luxury, depending on what price tag one puts on one’s own working time.

If one’s working time cost is 0.00€, then one is looking at 10.50€ per meal. Now considering one would buy the raw ingredients, which would on average cost only a fraction of the price, then one quickly realizes the luxury of such quick convenience foods.

(139/200)

Let p be price of cup and w be hourly work cost. Then the cost C of preparation per cup is

C = p + w * t

for time t in hours.

If we take a look at the three cup example for satiation of a meal M.

M = 3 * C = 3 * (p +  w * 0.083)

Let’s take a look at various price points p = {0.8, 1.5, 3.5} and various hourly wages w = {20, 50, 100}. Then this gives us the table WP.

w\p 0.8 1.5 3.5
20 7.4 9.5 15.5
50 14.5 17 23
100 27.4 29.5 35.5

Now considering that whole food costs a fraction p_f of the price of convenience food, though in return needs more prep time t_f.

This gives us the new equation of

C_f = p_f * p + w * t * t_f

and

M_f = 3 * C_f = 3 * (p_f * p + w * t * t_f)

We will look at p_f = {0.5, 0.8} and t_f = {5, 10}; only on the last two columns of the previous table WP.

First we will multiply p_f * p and t * t_f, so that we can use the equation M.

Let table P be

p_f\p 1.5 3.5
0.5 0.75 1.75
0.8 1.2 2.8

and table T be

t_f\t 0.083
5 0.42
10 0.83

This give us the equation

M_f = 3 * C_f = 3 * (P + w * T)

and the table WTF

w\t_f 0.42 0.83
20 8.4 16.6
50 21 41.5
100 42 83

with this we can finally calculate the table WPF

w*t_f\p_f 0.75 1.2 1.75 2.8
8.4 27.45 28.8 30.45 33.6
16.6 52.5 53.85 55.5 58.65
21 65.25 66.6 68.25 71.4
42 130.5 131.85 133.5 136.65
83 251.25 252.6 254.25 257.4

since 41.5 and 42 are close, we omitted the prior one.

The table WPF shows that considering one’s own wage price for food prep, then a meal becomes quite expensive.

So next time one complains how expensive a meal is at the , one can compare how expensive it would be if one prepped it oneself.

Show thread

@barefootstache meal prepping can help get the convienence of the storebought instant food for the price/health of the ingredients, but you tend to lose on shelf life without the commercial preservatives. I need to learn about making dehydrated meals.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.