barefootstache @barefootstache@qoto.org

#DailyBloggingChallenge (255/300)

Final thoughts:

The natural and/or plastic free gums currently cannot keep up with the enjoyment as from plastic-full gums. And the plastic-full gums are bad for the environment and potentially also for one's own health. So the decision I made a decade ago to give up gum was a wise one.

Future considerations:

Since neither gum option works for me, if I do find myself with the need to chew something will default to fiberous plant matter like a toothpick.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (254/300)

Looking at plastic based gums one can its validity on a personal level.

First considering that they are not biodegradable and thereby leaving a bad impression that they are, since one puts the substance in one's mouth.

Second, the science is still not settled what the effects of plastic does in our bodies, thus for the time period it is better to avoid them.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (253/300)

Noticed that plastic free is partially a weird marketing gimmick. The typical example is that the box is made out of paper and it is still sealed in a plastic like substance. It could be that the seal is not petroleum base.

The plastic free label is a notice for the ingredients list since most big labels have a polymer that is also found in car tyres.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (252/300)

Both natural and plastic free might be morally just and better for the environment, though have noticed that the chewiness lacks resistance and flavor is lost within minutes.

Adding more gum does extend the period, though had the tendency of biting my tongue more frequently.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (251/300)

Nonetheless here are some findings:

Tried 5 different brands from natural to plastic free to synthetic.

The two factors that justified the quality of the gum are:

1. the chewiness: the resistance of the material after the hard shell has fully dissolved.
2. the flavor decay duration: the amount of time needed until either a second piece is required or it becomes unjoyable to continue chewing.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (250/250)

The last 50 entries flew by as if they weren't anything. Though given it was only 50 vs the previous 100 entries. Additionally, most of the month of March, was posting twice a day and the 200th entry happened on 6. March 2024.

The data:

- 1 long form article (245)
- 4 thread chains (201, 212, 219, 225)
- 21 longested chain (225)
- 1 tree article (246)
- 1 article got its validity questioned (212)

The introduction of flexible posting reduced the stress of getting an article out and was the lesser case over daily postings. This time around no articles were pre-written.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (249/250)

As a backstory, gave up chewing a decade ago. This makes the experiment to test the hypothesis almost ideal.

Sadly it only lasted a month and thus couldn't prove or show any jaw definition.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (248/250)

When looking at one of the more popular regions, the abs, this could almost be the most typical examples.

On top of the muscle definition and fat deposits, another argument made is genetic make up as in the excuse of not getting the preferred natural (non-surgical) result.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (247/250)

"Defining one's jawline" assumes from the get go that one is slim enough to see the changes in one's face.

This is one of the main issues on muscle defined regions pop, the other is having large enough muscles to show their definition.

Thus muscles that lack much fat deposits close by are much easier to see change compare to others that don't have this luxury.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (246/250)

There exists a hypothesis that chewing gum can make oneself to get a more defined jawline. And quickly after scouring the web, one will find lots of results saying that it is not possible.

Now if one looks into the science of muscle growth, one learns that either more load or more time under stress will grows one's muscle. Thus the hypothesis of defining one's jawline with gum is possible.

The reasoning behind denying the possibility is that no sane person would chew multiple hours daily over multiple months to achieve such an outrageous goal and thereby covering up the hardship of such a feat.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (245/250)

This note taking schema is mentioned in this diary entry:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/barefootstache/diary/403828

The diary talks about #OpenStreetMap exploration in #Croatia. The author has to tackle three water crossings while carrying their 45 lbs #ruck and deal with prickly scrub without a machete. See if you would also be up for the challenge!

More photos: https://pixelfed.de/i/web/post/680766546871375419

#WeHackHealth #OptOutside #rucking #brooking

@barefootstache@en.osm.town
@rucking

#DailyBloggingChallenge (244/250)

Here is an example of the note `other pc` in the wild.

The red route is the planed route, where as the dark blue one is the one that was tracked.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (243/250)

Sometimes the flow of the ditch does not follow a path, in such a case the keyword `to` can help out.

E.g. `path to object` or `ditch s to path`, in either example the note should be placed at the location the flow diverges either from parallelism by ditches or linear fashion by paths.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (242/250)

The positional keyword `reverse|rev|-` is used to explain if either the mirrored or shapes are flipped. The direction of the flip is first on the vertical axis and then horizontal.

For the symmetric shapes `T, V, Y` it is obvious that adding `reverse` will flip it horizontal.

Further similarities with existing notations:

```
[ = rev]
```
```
] = rev[
```
```
L = right floor
```
```
revL = left floor
```
```
rev left floor = left ceil
```
```
rev right ceil = right floor
```

#DailyBloggingChallenge (241/250)

Sometimes the combo of positional with mirrored keywords is not enough, thus the shapes were introduced. These give the possibility to give a more concrete layout of the situation.

The situation can be an intersection of ways like seen with `T` or `Y`. Or it can highlight non-typical flow of the way seen with `L, V, ], [`.

This non-typical highlight does not conclude that there is no intersection of the way.

#DailyBloggingChallenge (240/250)

Now adding positional keywords to the mix, one defines the one-sided version of the mirrored keyword.

This means that

```
ceil = left ceil + right ceil
```

and respectively with `floor`.

Or more concretely `⌊ = left floor` and `⌋ = right floor`.