protip: just selfhost your stuff instead of giving drew more money to finance his cancel campaigns with. perfect opportunity now!
@limepeep i don't know what's remotely ok with repeatedly trying to cancel RMS for fabricated accusations.
@newt not that i'm aware of, but i'm sure he already has made up something new to white knight for.
the occasion is that sourcehut is getting ddos rn which is shit for the users of course.
which at the same time is a perfect opportunity to push repositories to something self hosted where one will not face the threat of account deletion for holding political views.
@newt there was some cancel bullshit by codeberg as well, i can't quite remember now though.
@newt
it was this, which is kind of funny in the current context
@newt @captainepoch at least the list has a point, in contrast with proactively deleting repositories out of the vague fear someone might sue because of a bullshit law.
@bonifartius@qoto.org What did he do this time?
@tyil nothing, sourcehut is getting ddos and it just is a good opportunity to move away from a service which reserves the right to delete accounts for political opinions :)
@bonifartius@qoto.org Ah, fair enough. I don't know if self-hosting Sourcehut is a lot of work, I do like the platform, so I can understand why people choose to use it. Its definitely an easier sell than Gitlab or Github, as Sourcehut is at least completely free software and uses standardized federated systems for communication.
@tyil it's a shame because in principle sourcehut is pretty nice.
self hosting is probably a bit complicated from what i have gathered over the years, it's somewhat of a microservice architecture.
@bonifartius@qoto.org Wonder if there's a market for hosted Sourcehut instances. Clearly it wouldn't even be a big market, as Sourcehut isn't really "dominating" the code forge markets, but just a couple hundred nerds paying 5 bucks a month could sustain a nice side-hustle.
@tyil from what i gathered over the years, it was hard enough to get people paying for sourcehut :) i think hosting things is a very shit business now, as people expect stuff to be working flawless all the time - doesn't matter that the big hosters have more outage than most small things.
hosting things is a very shit business now
It always was tbh, customers complaining all the time because they changed settings they shouldn't have and now some support employee is getting cursed at for hours.@Moon
wanted to reply yesterday, then something happened and i forgot xD
interesting examples indeed! the use case i came across while work usually was "linux vm, only more expensive" :) i was aware of the horizontal scaling, but never have seen an example of "serverless" which made sense.
> This is not suitable for all uses.
i think this is one of the core issues. one has to know most of the pitfalls of the business case and also all the available technologies and their pitfalls. people who are really good at both, or organizations where both are communicating well are pretty rare from what i have seen. might to a degree be a problem of germany though: tech people chase the latest trends but are too conservative to go all in and reap the benefits so one ends with the "expensive vm" solutions.
i was lucky enough to not having to do modern frontend webshit, but what i am told is absolutely horrible.
backend is ok, but i think it's pretty boring that everything is on top of HTTP. i get that HTTP being stateless and short lived connections is pretty good for the mobile world behind NAT and shit, still feels bad that things are this way. it's great to at least use a language one likes. i still have to give elixir a try :)
@Moon@shitposter.club @bonifartius@qoto.org Probably, but the grass is always greener on the other side eh. The biggest benefit of IT jobs is that the pressure is generally quite low (once you're settled somewhere), and the pay is high enough to buy a house on a single income.
@bonifartius@qoto.org Huh, what happened with Drew Devault? I only know him from the blogs he posts, and he seems okay.