@mibwright

Sure, that's fine. It's just that there's no objective / scientific way to conclude anything moral, or even unconditionally imperative, from any of that.

"This would contribute to your well-being, according to a criterion that many human cultures apply under different names" is not going to interest the deontologist who says "okay, but it's still morally wrong" and/or "okay, but still I shouldn't do it".