Mastodon becoming a US entity with a neoliberal board of directors and the goal of growth über alles is the issue here folks, not whether Eugen and company are compensated for their work. Of course they should be and well too. Or is that a privilege reserved only for the mediocre yes-people at the Googles and the Facebooks of the world?
Here’s a longer thread I wrote elsewhere. (1/7)
@aral In particular, imho Mastodon gGmbH should - together with other FOSS vendors and civil society entities - lobby to change §52 AO [1, 2] to include developing FOSS.
It already lists for example:
They are all each by themselves pretty arbitrary, and one can easily see how Mastodon touches a lot of them but doesn’t really match.
That’s also probably why it was first granted (one interpretation by the office) and then rejected (another, narrower interpretation).
[1] §52 AO english inofficial translation: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_ao/englisch_ao.html#p0441
[2] §52 Abgabenordnung, official, German: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/ao_1977/__52.html
@aral Ffs, “traditional customs including regional carnival” explicitly counts as charitable cause.