IMHO, the main problem with ‘simplification’ isn’t only the ‘shortcuts’ (fast tracks, no evidence/impact assessments, reduced democratic oversight…). It’s that the Overton window has shifted.
We’ve reached a point where changing laws that are there to protect fundamental rights feels acceptable. Even reasonable.
Once you treat fundamental rights as negotiable, every next reform starts from a weaker place. Honestly, I’m not sure how we come back from this, or if we can do it intact.

Follow

@itxaso Strictly speaking, we know we can come back from this because that's what we came from historically (fundamental rights weren't there under, say feudalism, or during nazism).
What's worrying in any case is the erosion of the accomplishments and how silent this goes on.

@cweickhmann Thanks! The current shifts aren’t happening after a rupture but within democratic institutions that still claim to uphold those rights. That makes the erosion quieter, but also more dangerous. When dismantling happens from inside the framework of legality, rebuilding isn’t a given.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.