Bahaha, there was a thread on the Bird Site talking about A City on Mars. The usual ad hominem stuff, but for the first time a guy implied we were maybe being paid by China. For the record, of the Chinese government wishes to fund longterm research projects on space settlement science (A) they really need to work on their propaganda game (B) please direct them to my bank account at once
@ZachWeinersmith I am always a bit surprised exactly how worked up people get over what’s essentially the proposition “living on Mars is really hard, actually, and you wouldn’t like it much”
@wordshaper I had a couple people ask if we were being too defensive in some of the opening sections to which I would always say, oh just wait. They will come.
@wordshaper The thing I really don't get is why so many people insist we're being purposefully dishonest and making stuff up. Like, the word "polemic" gets used, even though we've had quite a few readers say we were too apologetic and too nice to the space billionaires!
@wordshaper The kindest interpretation to me is they think we're the equivalent of a caveman saying fire won't work, and being roundly praised by elderly shamans. So, they tend to see more than is actually present in the work, e.g. that we're opposed to human progress per se, or we think humans can't overcome challenges, etc.
@wordshaper @ZachWeinersmith The shame is, there's some really interesting research being done that's critical to any of these utopian visions. Sciences and engineering, obviously, but also "human" sciences" like architecture and anthropology. With the obsession with the rockets and handwavey "we'll figure it out or maybe die gloriously" that work gets overlooked. A shame as it's often very accessible and has applications beyond "Mars Base Alpha".