Ok I just read this amazing paper 🖤 basically the data collected over two decades with a considerable big sample size is consistent to the cosmological dependence as this represents -I quote- “further evidence that we inhabit an expanding relativistic universe. The math is basically Bayesian approach, Markov Chain and Monte Carlo. The authors attributed the prior lack of evidence to small sample sizes, as I understood. Check this out 🖤 I got the impression that this article is going to get far… It is now on Nature too.
Pd. I told my mom after watching this stupid video telling that JWST recent observations disprooves the big bang theory and went as far as denying the expanding universe, that what we perceive as ‘time’ is only possible due to the universe being in expansion… I still feel like I’m wrong and honestly just wanted to win the debate xD haha however I told so because I do believe that and that is somehow obvious, and that if mistaken, I’ll be told otherwise when I advance my beautiful but hard af carreer .. any discussions on the topic are welcome.
@coreyspowell https://mastodon.social/@coreyspowell/110654165470048491
Btw, this part of the article reminded me of the reason of why I started to feel interest in learning programming seriously. Somehow I still find myself resistive to the idea of diving into Computer Science… but I’ve finally decided that I’m gonna take it seriously … I guess I should have before since I was looking for a job in the area… but that’s just fine, better later than never xD … anyway, someone told me once that while reading some papers he could not do but wonder how the shitty code in there even worked… that still causes me nightmares haha .. imagine you wrote your article and in the other side of the world someone wonders how the hell your code even works 🤣🤣💔 mmm tomorrow gonna check this code.. hopefully it’ll be great haha
