Logseq looks pretty good for personal wiki/knowledge management/notes-taking stuff. I like a lot of things about it.
But I’m resisting the usual urge to go all-in once I find something good, to transfer everything from my previous systems to this asap.
Going slow will let me find out what the weak spots of this particular ecosystem are, before I invest too much into it. Then, I can figure what use-cases are best fit for it, and what should remain in other systems.
@athulsudheesh
Being FOSS is a pretty high priority for me, so I didn’t look deeply into Obsidian. I did see that they were largely compatible with each other (some people even use both on the same folder). Maybe once I’ve explored LogSeq and its plugins, and hit their limits… I’ll check out what Obsidian offers that’s different.
@digital_carver yea. Usually I also always prefer FOSS tools. Obsidian is an exception. I felt comfortable using obsidian, since there’s is no lock-in. I can any day move to other alternatives.
@digital_carver @athulsudheesh local data, open format, many FOSS plugins, it seems (#obsidian newbie)
@digital_carver How does it compare to Obsidian ? Obsidian isn’t open source but at this point the user experience is top notch after you install a couple of community plugins. Last time I looked into LogSeq, I didn’t find as much community activity as Obsidian.