"the chatbot itself apologized while its maker, xAI, remained silent" — this is nonsense. The chatbot is a product and a tool of its maker, it doesn't have agency. The output it produces is legally produced by the maker.

Journalists subconsciously (or consciously!) anthropomorphizing chatbots are helping to remove this accountability.

Follow

@isagalaev Of course it does have agency.
The liability is a different question though.

@dpwiz liability stems from agency. And it can't have agency as it doesn't actually think.

@isagalaev I'm afraid your definitions of "agency" and "thinking" will chop too much. Like, a sizeable population of humans.

(Please don't go with "just predicting next token", or "just multiplying matrices", which also chop too much, from a bit different level.)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.