l'empathie mécanique @dpwiz@qoto.org

@carnage4life It doesn't matter. It is technically unfeasible to merge 2b-user network into 10m-user network without melting their servers.

@nazgul @yassie_j @grrrr_shark Fully integrates as in "a few billions of facebook users can report stuff on Fediverse"? I somehow doubt this is viable.

Of course one can do one-way integration instead of being "fully" integrated. But then there would be zombie army of spam instances manipulating FB feeds from outside.

The setup just can't work however you'd put it.

@wilfredh Yeah... But the security story here is not good, to put it mildly.

And that's only the passive summarization task. But some people are already wanting their digital twins to perform stuff in public

Don't be *that* person when the shit hits the fan

https://infosec.exchange/@kurtseifried/110566823883435956

@reidrac@social.sdf.org depends on who's your target audience. Are they DOS box users, or are they dosbox users?

Skipped a beat reading this in a notification

> Total mass of 3,291 kg (GPUs only;

3 tons of low-grade computronium for lease: https://andromedacluster.com/

On the importance of having a Maybe, not just nulls.

@reidrac@social.sdf.org "or" meaning "lightweight" nodes, like mobile/low power devices which come and go, and switch networks on a whim. The alternative is running something like a TOR relay or a torrent seedbox - always-ish connected, perhaps to unknown parties.

@reidrac@social.sdf.org The core idea is that you either connect to a storage swarm (Torrent-style) or to your friend store-and-forward nodes. This way you can have both anonymity and offline messaging.

@reidrac@social.sdf.org #GNUnet ticks many of the right boxes, but its tied with cold fusion with whoever comes first

https://secushare.org/comparison

@boilingsteam can't wait..

il faut imaginer sickos heureux

@wilfredh Does it work as smooth in Windows terminal?

@carnage4life "Skynet becoming self aware and dropping nukes" here is a dog whistle at best. Given your previous posts presenting x-risk mitigation as regulatory capture you seem to be quite dismissive of it.

And, again, it's okay to be near-term focused. There are real people suffering right now. I'm glad someone is working on it.
What I don't get is all the flak people get for their work on anything else besides that.
It's not like they're endangering your efforts or taking away resources from your cause, are they?

@carnage4life why not both? Both are good causes. It's okay to see only immediate picture. It's not okay to dunk on people which position you don't understand.

You can follow Pixelfed accs, no?

@daylightatheism @cstross @alexshendi @Eka_FOOF_A @ct_bergstrom Are you sure you aren't misrepresenting their point?

Bostrom refers to Pascal's Mugging[1], not the original "wager" formulation.

Anyway, the point is to **avoid** racing to unbounded rewards, disregarding any current costs.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_mugging

That resolves Roko's too, and it was resolved for almost a decade now.