l'empathie mécanique @dpwiz@qoto.org

@GalacticJew возврат это уже когда мир. До этого ещё дожить надо. А после этого я думаю большая часть уже остынет, походив 40 лет по пустыне^W Икее.

@GalacticJew да можно было бы и вернуть... со временем. когда со всеми соседями мир и у всех полно ресурсов чтобы можно было пристроить всех кто хочет, а кто не хочет не пристраивать.

@GalacticJew *деколонизация /s

@verge Dog-like AIs are coming!

@raph The framing is odd in there...

Qualitatively:

First and foremost, I find "retaliation" motive is inflated to obscure the elephant in the region.

Hamas and co spell it out, in their charters, that they want to wipe out each and every of 10M Israelis (and then continue to go conquer the rest of the world, but let's not digress). The Jews had their bloody lesson in the past century, that when somebody tells they want to kill you - you'd better believe them and act accordingly.

Retribution or not, they can't afford not having this war now. If somebody wants to save Gazans they should go and tell Gaza militants to surrender.

Quantitatively:

Um.. so, a few people came out to tell they don't want revenge. What about the remaining thousands who lost their friends and relatives?

@me https://activitypub.rocks/

@BartoszMilewski what would that even mean to have a gradual build up of "illusion of free will"?..

@BartoszMilewski Doesn't look right...

To be a evolutionary advantage it needs to be 1) represented in the genes and 2) have a gradual* build-up from the state of totally lacking it to the state of "promotes counterfactual reasoning"

* with the slope depending of difficulty encoding such a thing vs marginal inclusive fitness

@rticks@mastodon.social the problem I see with governance here is that you need to have the consent of the governed. Why should an engineer building their stuff listen to some "cyber ethicist" (is that a thing now?..) coming out of nowhere?

@rticks@mastodon.social um... I really mean the materials, like texts and drawings were coming from the team itself and. It is patently impossible right now, but that's the entire point of this charade - to find/make a machine that really learns. So, a team of arti-gogues made such a machine. It reads its ABCs, learns to learn, then watches some YouTube drawing tutorials with subtitles and starts painting its own stuff. Is it still theft?

@rticks@mastodon.social huh? How that would still be theft, given that they are the authors of the training materials?..

@rticks@mastodon.social would you be fine with them if they trained only on legitimately produced curriculum? So yeah, people who want to be artists can pretend to be artists (or, rather, just *be* curators in this specific niche of "generative this and that") - would it be a fair play?

@rticks@mastodon.social I find it hard to imagine how this would work. Can you ground this in some example for "AI" tech discussed in the article above?

@takosix @baldur Imagine the electricity bill of assholes using it to simply heat some air only to get it blown away outside by a draft. Or those who have audacity to have it cooled...

@rticks@mastodon.social Who do you allow do decide then?

@someodd the mess with the drivers is a single thing that gets me off nix and esp. nixos )=

@omgubuntu Noble Neanderthal

@willgfx And not a single picture in README...

@reidrac@social.sdf.org time shouldn't grow that large. The compiler should do this anyway by default, but there were problems with linkers etc.

My problem is usually forgetting to put the options back, or compiling projects that didn't use them. This results in object code duplication.