Show newer

@bougiewonderland @QasimRashid you're kidding, right? Haaretz is basically a branch of Al-Jazeera now, with all the narrative peddling bullshit that entails. Accuracy? Lol.

@tonyg but I'm up for more interesting tests. Just tone down our claims, 'right?

I sometimes feel like the academia is ad-supported - getting distracted into putting the glaze to the detriment of the substance.

@tonyg I don't like how they buried the models they did test. A had to dig into it just to confirm my suspicion that those were indeed obsolete. Kudos for Sonnet 3.5 for standing out though.

@aras Shifting enums are the worst. But then enums with the holes in them are also bad.
C enums -- a double-edged sword with no hilt.

@ericflo I had so much hope for it. Out of the crooked timber etc etc

OTOH maybe we have been lucky by avoiding some shitty ontologies getting baked in and instead let the content speak for itself.

@nivrig Meh. No concrete predictions or causal models. Classic punditry...

@tristanC > But at the end of the day, even though it is in fact possible to order custom designs from fabs like Samsung or TSMC, unfortunately, they are still very expensive.

You'd be delighted to know that tinytapeout.com/ exists (=

@light Using as "updating my nodes once in a while", yes

@nikitonsky what kind of a transparency report this is without even a mention alpha channels?

@abcdw I'm not actually sure... I just know Haskell's distributed-process cribbed a lot from Erlang and one of the features that got a lot of attention, up to improving the compiler, is the ability of sending closure over wire. But unlike Erlang that can just send its bytecode, Haskell had to send a function identifier (CAS for code part) and its closure data.

Counting days to my new Linux battlestation to arrive.

M1 is fine for a laptop I guess, but I miss having a GPU what isn't a joke.

And I miss the lived-in comfort of an Ubuntu (gnome actually, but whatever) desktop. MacOS feels incredibly inept and patronizing at the same time.

@marcel @smallcircles @libertyoftheforest With a few more levels of "we host your backups and you host ours", slicing, mixing, and anonymous scattering it is possible to achieve the level of resiliency above and beyond those of centralized silos.

However, this gets into political territory if we really into privacy as those would require extreme levels of anonymous mixing and you'd almost guaranteed to host some **nasty** stuff without a way to kick it out or even detect.

So, p2p is in the bind here: either you're vulnerable to metadata dragnets and association tracking or inadvertently trade resources with someone you wouldn't like (if you had the option to know).

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.