As the term 'intelligence' is used in 'artificial intelligence', it is perhaps worth asking, what kind of intelligence do AI systems represent? Confident and detail focused, but naïve, easily misled and lacking in common sense, worldliness, situational awareness, fairness, imagination, empathy, emotional intelligence and social intelligence 🤔
@kevlin @cwebber described ChatGPT as Mansplaining As A Service, and honestly I can’t think of a better description. A service that instantly generates vaguely plausible sounding yet totally fabricated and baseless lectures at an instant with unflagging confidence in it’s own correctness on any topic, without concern, regard or awareness even of the level of expertise of it’s audience.
@andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber At least it only does so when *asked*!
@pbrane @patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber
Do we really need more dis-/mis- or just generally bad information out here, just so some engineers can claim "10% more clever" for their 15 minutes? We should be using our power for good. Our ethics and mores are really not keeping up with the tech.
@dyedgrey @patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber I... don't think this thing is there "just so some engineers can claim '10% more clever'". I think ChatGPT is an amazing breakthrough and is genuinely useful.
I also think it has to be treated really really carefully, as yes, it can produce vast quantities of fake news, bad answers, etc.
The invention of dynamite lead to lots of weapons of destruction. It is also genuinely useful, industrially.
But I agree: we should not forget the harms.