Show newer

for M7.0 in

oblique reverse mechanism

@USGS_Quakes models suggest chance for triggered landslides/induced liquefaction slip

~50km length ~matches fault scaling relations

tectonic background: earthjay.com/?p=9811

earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquake

for in 2017 M 6.0 in the

earthquake allows us to learn more about the tectonics in this region
analogy event in 1987

read short report:
earthjay.com/?p=4897

for in 2023 M 7.0 offshore of

related to subduction zone, a convergent plate boundary system
@USGS_Quakes models show high chance for landslides and liquefaction

tectonic background interpretive poster here:
earthjay.com/?p=10727

for in 2020 M 6.4 offshore of

extensional (normal) earthquake
generated vertical land deformation
triggered a tsunami

read report:
earthjay.com/?p=9232

for in 2017 M 5.4 offshore of

strike-slip earthquake along boundary of the Explorer plate

report here:
earthjay.com/?p=4790

for M 7.5 along the Noto Peninsula, Japan

updated poster and tide gage plots
the Toyama tide gage recorded the largest size tsunami

report: earthjay.com/?p=11735

for M 7.5 along the Noto Peninsula,

generated observed at tide gages and by video observers
@USGS_Quakes ground failure models suggest induced liquefaction and triggered landslides

report here:
earthjay.com/?p=11735

for M 7.5 offshore of

@USGS_Quakes ground failure models suggest moderate chance for triggered landslides % high likelihood for induced liquefaction

2018 report has tectonic background earthjay.com/?p=7719

earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquake

2023 Annual Summary

This is a plot showing cumulative energy release for '17-'23 magnitude M>6.5
'23 released slightly more energy than '22
largest magnitude M 7.8 in

read annual review here:
earthjay.com/?page_id=11680

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.