@trz4747@mstdn.social Well, I don't know what you mean by "assault weapon". That is my objection. I'm not sure how else I can clarify.

FAWB is like CA's law, isn't it? Do you see it as an improvement? It seems equally absurd, since it is so similar.

@Pat here has given a totally different definition of assault weapon. By that definition, "assault weapons" have been pretty hard to get since 1986 or so, and remain so even after FAWB expired. So that clearly isn't what you mean.

You didn't seem to know about how FAWB means silly stuff like that adding a flash suppressor would turn an otherwise legal weapon into an "assualt weapon", so your definition clearly isn't "as US laws define the term".