1. Computer security is DIFFICULT.
2. Microsoft.
3. Defenders need to be perfect all the time. Attackers need only to be lucky once.
4. Connecting everything to a giant computer network is a bad idea. A very very very bad idea.
5. Microsoft.
6. Can't remember the ratio, but yeah, 1000 lines of code = 100 bugs, 25% to 50% of which may have security implications.
7. We can make it secure, but it would cost 400% more, and we would have a release every 3 years.
8. Microsoft.
@ParadeGrotesque @RickiTarr
Lol 😆 I’m so old government standards of a secure computer computer when I was learning:
a very deep hole within a guarded facility with multiple elevators with multiple security checkpoints with armed guards plus bio locks etc not connected to any other computer. 😁
@EVDHmn @ParadeGrotesque @RickiTarr even air gaps don't work so well anymore. Look what happens if you try to run your own nuclear centrifuges. Or connect a computer to change the biometrics on those locks.
@EVDHmn @ParadeGrotesque @RickiTarr it doesn't. Biological systems are robust against changes, where as human made systems tend to be brittle.
@rrb @falken @ParadeGrotesque @RickiTarr
https://www.cisa.gov
Code safe environments seems to be the umbrella at the moment.
@EVDHmn @falken @ParadeGrotesque @RickiTarr I like the secure by design pinky-promise.
Lots of supply chain attacks. You will see more. Have a project countering parts of that.
But, the feds no longer buying o days would do more
@falken @EVDHmn @ParadeGrotesque @RickiTarr
Governments invest hundreds of millions into keeping all of the computer systems insecure.
Read :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_How_They_Tell_Me_the_World_Ends