I think I figured out what is so annoying about - has written all its' docs assuming you are complicated bespoke service with dedicated staff to do "legal stuff". There's no pre-done, "just you use this" for perfectly standard, ordinary, foreseeable cases.

We shouldn't be arguing about "is every spammer who emails me porn a 'user' of my email service".

@falken fwiw and on your last point: there’s an exemption in the act for email services.

But I wholly agree with your point. It’s ridiculous that you need a lawyer to comply with this!

@michael what about email with a web interface ? what about ... ?
It's *astounding* don't already have canned answers for common sceneries, a month before they can start fining and harassing people.

@falken @michael AFAIK, an email list with web front end (or NNTP) as we have for php.net, is in scope. So I'll have to do a full-blown assessment for that too. sigh.

Follow

@derickr @michael or not. Just say you don't have "significant" number of UK users so out of scope.
point blank refused on call today to give a number/percentage/way to calculate so just decide if you are smaller than a tenth of a tenth of a tenth Facebook, it's fine.

My maths says less than 3 million isn't therefore "significant" by any global standard, or less than 60k by UK standards.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.