Show more

RT @opencitations
📢Workshop on Open Citations and Open Scholarly Metadata 2023 (Bologna 26-27 October 2023) @workshop_oc
📌Application deadline: 21 May 2023 ficlit.unibo.it/it/notizie/wor @UniboDHDK

RT @geographiecites
🧐ARCS, revue d’analyse de en : le portage de cette épirevue en diamant fait partie de la politique mise en place par @geographiecites pour soutenir et développer la ouverte. @GeoMaisonobe
geographie-cites.cnrs.fr/arcs-

RT @LeidenMadtrics
As scholarly communication is getting more diverse and transparent, demands for reliable information on platforms’ policies increase. The Journal Observatory aims to connect the dots and provide a high-quality overview. @neesjanvaneck @LudoWaltman @tonyR_H leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/the

RT @maoviedogarcia
Evolución de las publicaciones en de

Febrero 2023➡️1767 papers publicados
Marzo 2023➡️983 papers publicados
Abril 2023 ➡️328 papers publicados

Más detalles en mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/stats

RT @RickyPo
Including an interview with Alexandra Elbakyan in which she anticipates that Sci-Hub will become a museum. radiolab.org/podcast/library-a

RT @rn_msh
à du RnMSH 2023 : les projets de recherche doivent être inter-MSH, interdisciplinaires, entre différentes disciplines SHS et s'ouvrir vers les sciences de la vie et de la terre ! Ils doivent utiliser les plateformes et services des MSH
👉msh-reseau.fr/actualites#appel

RT @RHaunschild
Free hybrid workshop on "new approaches for extracting heterogeneous reference data"
on May 15/16, 2023. The program can be found here:
mpilhlt.github.io/reference-ex

The registration page is here:
plan.events.mpg.de/event/72/re

RT @TheCrankyPsych1
@mumumouse @mumumouse is eager to expose scientific fraud, and the ease with which she finds blatant evidence of it is an embarrassment to journals, editors, and authors involved. Instead of implying a sinister agenda, why don't you @angelosurpsenen ask yourself why there is so much fraud?

RT @DORAssessment
📢Register for the Africa, Americas, & Europe Plenary!
⭐Opening remarks: @Stephen_Curry
⭐Keynote: @sarahderijcke
⭐Panel discussion: @KarenStroobants @sciencysteph @yolandiswa & Judith Sutz
📅May 16
Register👇
ow.ly/xZxZ50NRJ4e

RT @boogheta
Avis de recherche : quelqu'un aurait une clé d'API Twitter académique v2 avec un crédit restant de quelques millions de tweets qu'il ne prévoit pas d'utiliser et pourrait gracieusement offrir au @medialab_ScPo avant la deadline de samedi pour compléter un corpus incomplet?
🙏🙏🙏

RT @gcabanac
🎙️Interviewed in @Spectrum about a recent retraction by @SpringerNature: “Journal retracts paper after spotting ‘tortured phrases’” by @avaskham doi.org/10.53053/OXMJ1455 — See the related @PubPeer report signalling the tortured phrases: pubpeer.com/publications/14851

RT @petejvickers
Suppose you want to ask "Why do philosophers of science and sociologists of science clash so much?" You could Google it, but you get a mess of information that isn't exactly answering the question. You could research it, but, really, you want an answer NOW. You could ask someone

Final outcomes of #JournalObservatory project have been released journalobservatory.org/.

Great collaboration with Bram v/d Boomen, @neesjanvaneck, @tonyRH and Serge Horbach.

Very proud of impressive technical work by Bram and Nees at @cwts. Scholarly publishing faces huge infrastructure challenges. First-class technical expertise is essential to tackle these challenges.

Try out Journal Observatory Browser app.journalobservatory.org/ to experience the power of #JournalObservatory infrastructure.

RT @PreparedEU
Ethics dumping, fast-track publishing, data sharing, public trust and more. SAGE @Research_Ethics is taking submissions for a special issue on research ethics and integrity matters in crisis situations. Deadline 30th Nov 2023! ow.ly/TLGh50NR8lw

RT @hug_sven
There is a new and exciting alternative to Google Scholar:

OpenAlex, the second largest database after Google Scholar, launched the beta version of its web GUI today.

Go check it out!

Congratulations to the OpenAlex team! 🥳 👏

alpha.openalex.org/works

RT @raphavisses
@OFIS_France "La question de savoir si un manquement à l’intégrité scientifique est susceptible de constituer « une menace ou un préjudice pour l’intérêt général » en raison de l’atteinte qui serait portée à la science ou à la recherche, demeure ouverte. ...

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.