Show newer

RT @jrgptrs
Is Economics self-correcting? We have a new discussion paper, joint with N Fiala & @flneubauer. Quick answer is: No, rather not. We reviewed all replications published as comments in the AER. Plus, we surveyed the authors. A short thread 1/. bit.ly/3y0wMYp

RT @LexBouter
"... intentionality is difficult to prove beyond doubt and is only one of many criteria that should be taken into account when deciding on the severity of a breach of research integrity..." bit.ly/3SPKois
@WCRIFoundation @NRIN_Integrity @EmbassySci

RT @csugimoto
Elated to find our book on for at the ! Eager to share it with the world! @lariviev @sppgatech @GeorgiaTech @UMontreal @Harvard_Press

RT @kembellec
L'intro des actes du dernier colloque @Doc_Soc est accessible librement, en attendant l'ouvrage d'ici quelques jours
"Communication scientifique et science ouverte
Opportunités, tensions et paradoxes"
ed. A. Mahé, I. Mayeur, E. Poupardin, C. Prime-Claverie
calameo.com/read/00001585692ec

RT @DanLarremore
New one on my list of favorite papers.

"Academic Urban Legends"

It explores the ironic follies of how we cite literature by tracing a myth: that we think spinach has a lot of iron only because of a decimal point error in the early 1900s. h/t @jugander

journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11

RT @aselbst
Starting with the point that lawmakers are “freaked out” about ChatGPT is an example of criti-hype (@STS_News’s term), where even critics give AI too much credit. ChatGPT is a very good predictive text generator, presenting certain concrete challenges. No need to be freaked out twitter.com/geomblog/status/16

RT @RI_MTU
At the launch of . A very exciting European project on and including

@Path2Integrity @H2020INTEGRITY @EmbassySci @drjenbren @anita_maguire @natalie_cevans

RT @maoviedogarcia
Maria Leptin, President of European Research Council @ERC_Research, at launching meeting:

-ChatGPT is an issue to look at.
-ChatGPT cannot be an author because is not a legal person and cannot take responsibility.

RT @cnni
A mosque, a synagogue and a church provide a new center of worship in Abu Dhabi

RT @CamilleGaubertb
[Fraude scientifique] Sur ce site (traduit du russe) bien connu de l'experte @AbalkinaAnna, vous pouvez vous acheter une place d'auteur sur un faux article scientifique que vous n'avez pas écrit, mais qui sera vraiment publié. Le 1e place est déjà vendue pour 2300 euros environ.

RT @lisstumr
[Distinction] 👏🥈 Félicitations à Michel GROSSETTI, lauréat 2023 de la médaille d'argent du @CNRS
Sociologue spécialiste des réseaux sociaux au
il a entre autres élaboré la méthode des « narrations quantifiées »
cnrs.fr/fr/personne/michel-gro

RT @Alexis_Verger
Cool, le CNRS a le droit aux honneurs du @canardenchaine de cette semaine

RT @weisenburger_e
Une belle journée d'étude Qualifier l’interdisciplinarité : vocabulaires, réseaux, outils et indicateurs le 1er juin organisée par @naturmusee @BUSorbonne_Univ @uvsq @UnivParisSaclay avec le soutien de @iledefrance journee-obispa.sciencesconf.or

A new short policy brief from Gunnar Sivertsen and myself, sharing our thoughts on the European Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment.
r-quest.no/wp-content/uploads/

RT @NathanneRost
@ErrantScience would you please make a cartoon for my poster? 🙂

RT @NathanneRost

The Post-Publication Peer Review is an initiative to science self-correction. In @_Nano_Bubbles we critically analyse articles claiming intracellular detection by nanoparticles, and post our reviews on PubPeer. Visit also @MahaSaid92's poster to know more.

RT @Hitz_zentroa
This Thursday, March 2, at 15:00 CET we will host our next online webinar:

Title: "Beyond fact checking - Modelling information change in scientific communication"

Speaker: Isabelle Augenstein (@IAugenstein)

More info and registration form: hitz.eus/webinar_izenematea

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.