Frédérique Bordignon @fredbordignon@qoto.org

RT @jgeller_phd
So excited! Tomorrow we have @dsquintana giving a talk on meta-analysis. If you are free and interested please consider joining us.

RT @Sonic_urticant
🔥📣[THREAD]
1/ Demain (20/03/2023) on fêtera les 3 ans de la "publi scientifique" de Didier RAOULT à l'origine du plus grand scandale sanitaire de tous les temps. Ca tombe bien : des documents CONFIDENTIELS viennent d'être publiés. Et c'est encore pire que ce qu'on pensait...⏬

RT @timmarchman
Ivermectin seems to be taking over from bleach as the thing parents are forcing on their autistic kids; horrifying story from @daithaigilbert https://www.vice.com/en/article/pkayeg/ivermectin-kids-autism

RT @INORMS_REWG
Why is a ranking supporting the #MoreThanOurRank initiative?

Come along to our 17 April Community Call to hear @LudoWaltman explain!

https://inorms.net/more-than-our-rank-community-calls/

RT @iFromm
The tentative schedule of our Bibliometric-Enhanced Information Retrieval (BIR 2023) workshop @ecir2023 had been published: https://sites.google.com/view/bir-ws/bir-2023?authuser=0. Hope to see you in Dublin!

#bir2023

(w/ @Philipp_Mayr @suzan @gcabanac)

RT @GemmaDerrick
Today I resigned my position as Editor-in-Chief of @Public_MDPI. I do not consider our journal, Publications, to be predatory in any way but my decision is precipitated by a continual tension between my outward-facing role as Editor in Chief of Publications 1/3

RT @maglarecherche
🔸ÉDITION SCIENTIFIQUE : Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri (@BoukacemZeg) décrypte le phénomène des revues (et des conférences) prédatrices, fléau de plus en plus présent dans le milieu de la recherche, dont il exploite les failles https://www.larecherche.fr/vie-scientifique-%C3%A9dition/la-pr%C3%A9dation-dans-la-publication-scientifique

RT @ljegou
Les grands éditeurs sont un gage de sérieux :
#traduction #science

RT @LeidenMadtrics
Narrative CVs allow researchers to contextualize their career. In a 5-day workshop, a collective of researchers, funders, policy makers and administrators reflected on this type of CV, including open questions, but also opportunities of the format.

1/4 https://www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/narrative-cvs-a-new-challenge-and-research-agenda

RT @Fractale04
Publications scientifiques diffusées sans droit : blocage de 183 noms de domaine - SciHub, .... https://www.legalis.net/actualite/publications-scientifiques-diffusees-sans-droit-blocage-de-183-noms-de-domaine/

RT @NUOpenResearch
It's only two weeks until #OpenResearchWeek! Register for the Narrative CVs session with @HilaryNoone from @UKRI_News⬇️

https://libcal.northumbria.ac.uk/event/4010568

RT @csugimoto
Deeply saddened to hear of the passing of my friend and colleague @LoetLeydesdorff. Although most will remember him for his prodigious publishing and scholarly banter, I will always remember him for his laugh. Missing you, @LoetLeydesdorff.

RT @DrOlayaMoldes
Very entertaining talk about fraud in academia from @deevybee 👏👍

Current problems:
- Tracking back paper mills is done on volunteering bases!
- There is a need to remove incentives for fraud
- We need to reward & promote #openscience and Pre-registration

#icps23be

RT @westermarcklab
I have resigned from my position as the editor of @Cancers_MDPI. I thought they were going to right direction but having experienced too many times reviewer comments neglected, or just rushing to publish with our revisions, I must agree with this listing. https://predatoryreports.org/news/f/list-of-all-mdpi-predatory-publications

RT @s1excitedstate
My job is safe from AI... for now
@MicrobiomDigest
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.01.28.526052v1

RT @pash22
Very good tweetorial by Florian. @lemondefr is defo living in a fantasy world @lucadf https://twitter.com/NaudetFlorian/status/1634464249136181248

RT @MishaTeplitskiy
Data are surely out of date now but still:

At PNAS, acceptance rate for
➡️direct submissions: 18%
➡️contributed* submissions: 98% ‼️

* contributed = author is NAS member, can choose his/her reviewers etc.

https://www.nature.com/articles/510330a

RT @RetractionWatch
Wiley paused Hindawi special issues amid quality problems, lost $9 million in revenue https://retractionwatch.com/2023/03/09/wiley-paused-hindawi-special-issues-amid-quality-problems-lost-9-million-in-revenue/

RT @Mario_Malicki
After some delay, our survey (n=3,659) was published today. In 2018, 21% of authors, reviewers, and editors believed we should preregister studies, and 60% that we should share data and code. Additionally, 20% admitted sacrificing quality for quantity. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0270054

RT @MicrobiomDigest
The lightest degree of punishment for scientific fraud is: no punishment at all. The fraudster goes on publishing scientific papers. They go on getting paid by their university. They go on speaking at conferences and teaching students.
@StuartJRitchie writes. https://twitter.com/StuartJRitchie/status/1628814012942106626