🇳🇱
Ruth Bater Ginsburg is s awesome, and right. Even she thinks the Kavanaugh trial is a partisan circus and uncalled for. What is going on with the partisanship is plain wrong, she is right. Democrats AND Republicans should be ashamed of themselves.
Hear her comments for yourself: https://youtu.be/AriOjUfbBrw
@Shekelcoin Can you share a specific quote from her so I can draw my own conclusion?
@Shekelcoin Did you bother to go to the **original source** cited int he paper you just pasted. It gives you the exact page to look at and everything. Guess what, when you do it is crystal clear she was no advocating lowering the age of consent to 12 years old.
In all honesty did you ever even do that research or just accept an out of context quote from an obscure second-hand source as fact? I mean dont get me wrong its a common mistake so not trying to ridicule you for it. Just saying that should have been a red flag immediately and checking the cited primary source should have been the first step.
@freemo
if you want to defend the talmudic normalization of pedophilia (and radical feminism, for that matter) go ahead, but it's despicable and pathetic. Maybe you can't read but saying it's not pedophilia unless the 'victim is younger than 12" is advocating legalizing sex with prepubescent children.
@Shekelcoin She never said that. What you showed is a case where RBG talked about removing sexualized language from laws (instead of saying wife saying spouse for example). She cited an example of this from an old, now defunt, law that had a part of it talking about 12 year olds...
The important part is SHE NEVER SAID THE AGE OF CONSENT SHOULD BE 12 YEARS. She never hinted at it, or suggested it. If you actually bothered to pull your head out of your ass and READ and do RESEARCH to understand things that would have been painfully obvious after about 15 seconds of googling...
Bit hey if you want to defend stupidity, go ahead, but its despicable and pathetic.
The fact you think you can research a scrubbed internet is telling enough.
What do you not get about this whole free speech thing? You are on a free speech platform, the problem is not limited to social media sites.
The ability to archive webpages exists for a reason.
https://archive.org/web/web.php
The bigger question is why lionize some in a curated internet while attacking others? Who is gaining?
We need decentralized internet and the failure of our current big tech.
@AnonByNature I have no idea what your saying here.He is welcome to his free speech, just as I'm welcome to point out that he is being an asshole based on ignorance rather than opinion. He cited one source for his opinion and even once that source was looked into (followed the primary sources it referenced) it wasnt even making the slightest attempt at saying what he thought it was saying. Despite this he was accusatory and rude from the get go. The perfect combination to get ridiculed IMO.
You want to find a copy of: Sex Bias in the U.S. Code: A Report of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
The problem is the only listing every website cites gives you an error.
The reason why you won't find it is because of the passage listed below.
Its no longer hyperbole. Ask CA.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB1322
The internet is controlled as cable tv
RBG's history with the Sex Bias in the U.S. Code is summarized below.
finding the publication = capture the flag
@AnonByNature Sure, I appreciate those links. But is there a point being made here, if so I'm not clear on what that is from your side.
@freemo @AnonByNature The point is Ruth Bader Ginsburg is promoting a Talmud base religious Jewish perversion agenda to demoralize the US (and world) by promoting radical feminist ideals and pedophilia through the highest court in the land and you are praising her.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcG6m_lL4Ww&t=87s
@Shekelcoin
Except the fact that you have yet to show even the smallest piece of evidence that suggests that is the case.
The one link you provided didnt have anything about her promoting 12 years as the age of consent. Which is why this is so laughable right now, particularly with the ignorant and rude way you presented your case.
@freemo @AnonByNature It's common knowledge since the 70's that she argued to lower the consent age to 12 years old, it's not my fault you refuse to believe it. it's been public record since 1972. I posted a video where it's documented around the 5 minute mark, and also gave you a government site that recorded her views. You're just being ignorant at this point.
@Shekelcoin
Amazing how all this common sense and not even the smallest shred of evidence. Funny how that works...
He thinks the internet is a blockchain and immutable. move along.
@Shekelcoin I missed the video by the way, feel free to reshare and ill look.
@AnonByNature
@Shekelcoin To be specific the phrase that included a refernce to being "less than 12 years old" was NOT a quote from RGB but in fact from the 1937 Senate bill, S. 1400, specifically section §1631. As I said she cited this as an example of a law with gender neutral language and at NO POINT promoted the idea of pedophilia itself.
@freemo She is not that awesome because she is an advocate for legalizing and normalizing pedophilia and wants the age of sexual consent lowered to 12 so that pedos can legally rape children with parents being powerless to stop it.