@freemo
what situation will that enormous gun improve?
@dantheclamman Quite a few. It would be far safer than a handgun for example due to improved accuracy (and relatively weak bullets for a rifle). There is a reason it is the most common gun, it performs very well.
@freemo
you need a scope for home defense?
@freemo
I really am not attacking you and its your call but this looks like a weapon for long distance offensive combat.
@dantheclamman combat? no one uses weapons for combat. Its for participating in a sport (shooting is a sport at ranges). In all liklihood it will never be used against a person, just like most guns.
Moreover if the scope was ever used outside of a shooting range most AR-15 are used for hunting (mostly small game) due to its excellent design and small caliber bullet.
@freemo
I mean you said you keep it with magazine ready where you sleep. Sounds like not for sport.
@dantheclamman It has a great many useful purposes, sport, decoration, defense, hunting, science experiments (of which i did a few with it). Defence is certainly one aspect where it can play a role, and i am prepared should it need to play that role. But in the end that is truely the least likely role the gun will ever actually play. All the others are far more applicable .
@freemo
I understand non emergency uses you mention, but it doesn't seem like having it avail for action helps for those uses. Meanwhile accessibility of a gun is directly associated with dramatically increased odds ratio of death by homicide. http://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/1814426/accessibility-firearms-risk-suicide-homicide-victimization-among-household-members-systematic
@dantheclamman Odds dont tend to apply for individuals.
Ig you wanted to know *my* odds then youd have to gather statistics for people who are most similar to me in both training, intelligence, ideals, temperment, and practices.
Obviously the odds of someone who is reckless or irresponsible with their guns is on one end of that bell curve and the odds of someone who is responsible and well trained on the other.
So really has little to no applicability to me as an individual.
Now if you want to talk about how we can make guns safer for the general population, sure, there is some relevance here, but that is not what is being discussed.
@dantheclamman
Again the odds of some random person, including the vast majority of idiots, picked from the population and thuis having a high chance of negative effects almost never applies to individuals outside of the mean in terms of intelligence, behaviors, training, etc.
You simply cant take a population wide average and think it holds any relevance to someone who does not have qualities that would cause them to fall within the mean.