@freemo

I guess I fail to appreciate the burden of having to write code to benefit users at all levels of skill and financial capacity.

Sorry.

@masterofthetiger

@🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 History has shown the GPL not to be a significant limitation to software development. Linux dominates servers. You can even build locked up systems like Android with it. Wine switched to GPL because of companies make closed source forks. OpenOffice has languished under the Apache license while LibreOffice thrives with GPL. You may not like GPL and want people to use MIT or other license but it really isn't a big problem.
Follow

@dulsi I disagree, there have been massive wasted efforts to get off of GPL in the past due to its viral nature preventing things moving ahead.

If you want specific examples you only need to look to the X11/Xorg disaster where the entire system needed to be rewritten.

If you want less anecdotal evidence just need to look at the trend in software development int he last 4 - 8 years. In 2012 GPL dominated but since then permissive licenses have taken over and GPL projects have gone by the wayside. Where in 2012 60% of active projects were copy-left the current numbers are about half of that (with permissive licenses now being the dominant license in oss/linux world).

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.