@auramun@anarchism.space I have read the article. Again being non scientific and opinion based it left out a **lot** of technical detail and nuance that would be critical. In fact it is not disagreeing with me but we would have to discuss that nuance and detail for you to understand why.

You said however you didnt want to discuss race further. Which is it?

It sounds like every time i make a point that proves you wrong you want to slam the door shut ont he conversation then when you hear a point that backs up your claim you want to revive it again. How about if you want to revive the race talks we back up to where we left off then...

Or drop it and go back to the original point, up to you.

I appreciate that you are trying to be more respectful. I see your tone. I think your still being driven emotionally to some extent rather than being objective about the topic. Which isnt horrible, but it is making it hard to have productive discourse to some extent.

Not trying to say your emotions are bad, these are important issues and i understand why one might get emotional about it. It just isnt productive to the conversation.