So as some of you may have noticed I have been thinking about the political compass lately and how I can explain the various axis to people, as well as where I feel a lot of America lies on this chart.

Its clear terms like Left, Liberal, Libertarian, conservative are often misused, confused, or to be more generous, have multiple conflicting definitions.

So lets be clear about one point. Language is fluid. People use the terms in conflicting ways, thats ok to a point, but its gotten so bad that it makes communication difficult because you never know what definition someone is really using. So I'm going to use the technical definition here mostly rather than the colloquial ones. Usually the definition of left and right just means Democrat and GOP in america, but I find that really masks a lot of nuance.

So when we talk from a technical angle Left really means "The government should force the more fortunate to help the less fortunate" this tends to mean if your Left you support redistribution of wealth and social programs, if your left to the most extreme then your basically some form of communism where you feel all wealth should be distributed evenly. Right on the other hand tends to mean you support free markets, in its most extreme you would want no financial regulations of any kind, a pure capitalism (no not the USA sort of capitalism, full pure, extreme capitalism). Socialistic countries such as much of Europe would fall about 2/3rds of the way towards the left, more capitalistic countries like the USA would probably fall closer to 1/3rds of the way towards the left, but still left leaning. There are very few countries today that would fall towards the right side of the spectrum

The top to bottom side is much easier to understand. The top most side would represent Authoritative regimes. Basically the farther towards the top you go the bigger the government you have and the less freedom the people have to question the government or collective opinion. The farther to the bottom you go the closer you appeal to the Anarchist mentality of small government with minimal power.

Now whats interesting to me is the DNC in america would fall very close to the top-left corner, about 2/3rds or closer to that top-left corner. The GOP I'd say falls towards the top-right corner, also about 2/3 of the way there. Most people who are consistently independent however seem to fall somewhere near the bottom-middle. I myself am bottom-middle, about as far away from either of these parties as I could be short of being an actual anarchist (im not all the way at the bottom). I'm more than happy about where I wound up.

@freemo To be more precise, communism doesn't necesarily mean a complete even distribution. If you seize the means of production, you have socialism, but people can still have different salaries.

Follow

@DracoMagister Communism in its pure form does mean even distribution. If you have a graph that shows 100% communism it implies that is your stance. If your goal is something less than that, such as socialism, then youd be close to the communism scale just not 100%, socialism would have you about 2/3rds of the way there to the left like I mentioned.

Keep in mind we arent talking about communism as in governments named communism because no such thing as a pure communism, everything is at least a little bit a compromise and only partially communistic. We are talking about the pure and rarified ideology when we talk about the spectrums.

Β· Β· 0 Β· 0 Β· 1
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.