@cwebber@octodon.social to me the answer is simple, hierarchical block/mute lists with both whitelisting and black listing capability. Mastodon and the fediverse almost got it right by allowing users to rely on their local instance to moderate, but the lack of override ability from the users or the ability for multiple inheretence is the killer.

@freemo @cwebber
"white...", "black..."; interesting choice of language per se.

As a novice user of primarily diaspora and hubzilla, these protocols have been observed (personal observation, not definitive data) signficantly less abusive in content encountered, compared to mastodon and pleroma.

@ourdiaspora

Interesting how? They are standard terms that have been in use a long time. White is a color that includes all other colors, therefore whitelist is intended as a list that includes "all the things in the set".. black is a color that excludes all colors, therefore blacklist is a term taht means "things excluded from the set"

I suppose the terms are rather interesting and cool when you look into them, I never thought about that.

I am not sure the protocols will dictate the abusiveness of the content in the network itself.However it will, and the intended goal should be, to give you more control over the content you are exposed to.

@cwebber@octodon.social

@freemo @ourdiaspora @cwebber In ancient greek democracy a 'yes' vote was cast by placing a white stone in a large jar, and a 'no' vote was cast by placing a black stone instead. The idiom 'blackball' to mean to deny or negate something as a reference to greek voting was in frequent use in English going back centuries. In WWII British ports would 'blackball' (deny entry and services to) vessels believed to be carrying supplies bound for the german war effort. The list that was circulated to the portmasters of these 'blackballed' ships became knows as the 'black list'. The term 'whitelist' emerged simply as the opposite of 'blacklist'.