For every #covidiot the price increased to 1 million
We award 1Million โฌ for the scientific proof of the existence of a #coronavirus , including the documented control attempts of all steps taken in the #proof.
::Herp derp::
You: We offer 1 million award for proof of covid
::thousands of doctors offer undeniable proof of covid::
You: Not like that, you have to prove it in a way that conspiracy theory know nothings that would never admit they are wrong wind up admitting they are wrong... silly doctors!
@akeno links to an idiot that agrees with you is not evidence you are right.. it just means there is more than one idiot.
@akeno Did you even watch the video, thats not what he said... He was asked about the fish market and the data specifically out the fish market. He stated the issue was that while they tested the animals and it tested positive they never isolated the virus from the samples **at the fish market**, and that he suspected the source of the virus was somewhere else.
What he did **not** say is that we never isolated the virus at all/in general.
So yea, pretty sure im sticking with who the idiot is here.
I only argue for liberty with people who believe it's real. I don't know if it's real. Anyone that says they had it seemed to have the flu. When I try to research I get doctors who aren't given live samples to do lab comparison, but every lab test done on someone who is "positive" by field test has the flu. The other side I only find assumption.
It's just not worth picking a side on this. Just advocate for liberty regardless.
Just because youa re too inept to be able to do the research needed to see the mountains of evidence that proves its real doesnt make it so.. your conclusion there shouldnt be "well i guess its not real".. it should be "Well I guess I have no idea what I'm doing and have no fricking clue how to research this topic and should go humbly ask for some help"
Try reading what I wrote again.
If I don't know a topic and the "research" looks fake I can't make a stand on the subject. Regardless I'll advocate for liberty, even if it had 100% death rate and was highly contagious.
I'm definitely not taking your work for anything, emotion is the enemy of rational argument. If nothing else my comment is meant to get people that want the same thing to stop wasting time arguing without cause.
I heard what you said, and again if the research looks fake then its simply because you are inept at finding good research or determining its validity, which derives from the fact that you dont know the topic.
I made no object to you siding with liberty, if you want to argue people should have a right not to vaccinate if they wish or not wear masks I would agree with you, so the liberty part of your argument isnt in question.
If you just said "I have no clue about any of this and therefore cant say" I wouldnt have much issue. But your own words were, for example:
"the "research" looks fake"
So clearly your reading research and drawing some highly incorrect conclusions, and clearly are inept and knowing when research looks fake or real.
As to your conclusions about liberty, again, thats not the part that concerns me.
You focussed on the synapse of what I found when I decided to look into it. I didn't doubt the validity for at least 6 months. After no practical evidence in that time period, I can't discredit the idea that it could be fake.
The reason you gave about viral spread is not evidence, it begins with assumption.
One side has no real evidence.
The other points at the lack of evidence.
Neither have proof. Stop being a shill and wasting people's time.
"After no practical evidence in that time period, I can't discredit the idea that it could be fake."
Again, this is simply because you are inept at understanding the research. There is mountains of practical evidence. The proof is overwhelming, you just either lack the intelligence or the expertise to understand the evidence.
@freemo @Coyote @akeno
You think I can search the internet and trust what some people wrote.
Both sides have some merits. In this situation I would have to physically study it, and it's not in my expertise. Funny enough, online research is, and I have no problems poking holes in theories that are blatantly wrong.
It's especially irrelevant, because real or fake my response will be the same. Absolute personal responsibility, liberty, and private property rights.