🇳🇱
We tried to address that in the wording, if you feel it isnt clear we are more than welcome to improved verbiage and would welcome you edit suggestions.
Posing anti-trans sentiment as “legitimate concerns”, speaking in scientific lingo so as to seem you’re approaching it on the basis of fact rather than hatred.
Trans people are a protected group we explicitly list, what you describe would be “nefarious” as such this would be explicitly against the rules and not simply “unpopular”. This is why we say “nefarious” and not just hate speech by itself.
Similar anti-migrant sentiment can be posed as economic concern. The intent not to be to actually discuss them from what are posed as rational positions that put sentiment aside, but to spread hateful ideas under a veil of legitimacy
If they are hateful ideas then they cant be voiced rrespectfully IMO, this would violate the respectful clause as that simply is not respectful no matter how you word it. That said, again, if you have a better way to word this im all for it.
