I tend to agree, that there must be some cutting down. But ig someone is willing to pay to sequester carbon so they can emit carbon, and they wouldnt otherwise purchase that sequestering, who cares, let them. No harm done. They should still be required, overall to be in the negative.
Huh? You are saying the same thing.. stopping the extraction of fossil carbon is literally "cutting down carbon emissions".. what are you disagreeing with?
@freemo Clearly, you don't understand the problem. It is not a case of "cutting down", the science is clear, we have to stop the extraction and release of fossil carbon.
The laws of physics don't care about political opinion, there is no other option (or other planet we can move to).