Is there an actual study on this trying to quantify it?
The population of the usa in '69 was 200 million, so at almost half a million people at woodstock that would mean that 1 in 400 people alive in '69 had attended the festival... Thats pretty huge when you think about it. 0.25% of the entire population at a single festival, thats massive!
I dont doubt for a second there are plenty of people who lie about it. Its the sort of thing i expect people to make up.
But I'd be curious what the actual numbers are around that.. cause at ~1% of people alive today (and 0.25% of people alive at the time) thats a pretty massive section of the population.
I never met a single person who had claimed to go to Woodstock, so my personal experience differs, but thats another matter.
If we take this a step farther...
One can assume most of the people who attended woodstock were under the age of at the time and that most of the people alive today would have been people under the age of 30.
The US population is about 25% under 30. We could also eliminate anyone under the age of maybe 15 or so since they would be too young to attend, but thats another matter.
As a rough estimate we can assume about 1% of people alive today probably went to woodstock if they were alive at the time.
@freemo @chris
speaking strictly anecdotally, most of the people I've met from that that era, that would have been of age range to attend woodstock, told me they had either gone or tried to go and didn't make it. None ever supplied details.
One even said he got a ride home from Bruce Springsteen, who I don't believe ever said he went to Woodstock.