If breaking any software or set of rules is against the law itself then, as a whole or effectively, the law ends up covering whatever a publisher wants with less caveats and less restriction under the software protection.

(often I think, innocently and not innocently, law / science / tech don't understand what their codes are or can't see the computer code itself (often both) in order to then understand how / what to moderate about it or even what's bad to start with)

Here's a list... I welcome more

- What algorithms are currently set in Twitter / Facebook
(....what any platform is actually favouring using live algorithms, when it was changed. WOULD BE GOOD TO SEE THAT!)

- GDPR and cookies - what it means or what it effectively does and doesn't do (...why / how it does it)

- Google Camera Cars (filming people and places without consent or against various state rules....
( states or a whole country realising they need to put "No google cars" into their rules books!)

- more as list welcome....