The same thing that Threads might allegedly do to Mastodon is apparently absolutely desirable when Mastodon does it to the rest of the Fediverse; CW: long (914 characters), Fediverse meta, non-Mastodon Fediverse meta, Threads/Meta/Facebook/Zuckerberg
@jupiter_rowland while you're right about this, I am not 100% happy of Meta joining the Fediverse. Think of the volume of data they collect through and outside of their platforms. Think of all the scandals they've been through regarding allowing extremist groups to promote their agenda and manipulating the vote and the public opinion.
(Most of) Mastodon has no targeted ads or data harvesting,is pretty standard and, above all, is self-hostable. That means that if you see any such bad behavior or something like that on any server, you can join another server that doesn't have this, or spin your own and control it all. On Threads, you only have one - very toxic - server provider. That's it.
And also, most of the Mastodon users are already aware, to different degrees, of the existence of the Fediverse and what it means. For Threads users, this is just some alien concept that they don't understand - and probably never will. They never joined Threads with the Fediverse in mind at all. They joined simply because of Threads and Threads only.
If I were to choose only between Mastodon and Threads, I'd choose Mastodon all the time.
And also, most of the Mastodon users are already aware, to different degrees, of the existence of the Fediverse and what it means.
About measurement / evidence... Most is self-evident I think frm people benig here in the first place...
@jupiter_rowland @jrp
It's currently not measured exactly how many are against Thread and in what way, but there are some outside... and how many people are for I think as it's safe mission' level of change, so Jupiter is right that anything that risk that would naturally make it high ranking for developers or users to consider important... ..since that is why they came here in the first place (also hard to measure other than the evidence they actually signed up to a deliberate and previously more obscure 'thing' which I count as evidence in itself somewhat).