Follow

Share the love - it shouldn't be exclusive or opposite to PolyAmory 

Share the love - it shouldn't be exclusive or opposite to PolyAmory

This statement edges towards BUT not sex - more like the people who are like you who enjoy discussion and you do different sports with (sports of the mind mostly) and like going to play with friends occasionally (which can include mind and body contact).

As a very cold and blunt example of in this context of life, ask yourself:

"I didn't fuck everyone I did sports with, right?"

So as with "PolyAmory" you don't fuck everyone - the word is polyamory is a bit of a category perhaps overstating itself (it's usage by others) and simply more this definition:

" involving relationships with multiple partners with the knowledge and consent of all involved "

Those that say sex first as definition might show they have only have sex on their mind or classic binary thinking of human interaction as "sex or nothing" - so not multi-level relationships.
NOT HAVING LEVELS IS 100% UNHEALTHY. So I hope this clarifies why it's more healthy than not.

And I hope that it is not you or you explore / interact with people a bit more.

⚠️ But if you have any questions about how imperfect polyamory can be (as in life imperfect but better to love than not love / stagnate) then let me know.

The idea is that if you are caring can state and discuss things... we can do polyamory as topic (also you find people who can express or be clear can do love at different levels better).

Said with love! (not sex)
(or interpret as "Said with kind regards, towards 1 humanity")

of

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.