This might be why I'm not so happy with the world and/or see more potential in nice people or my admin or peers.

People might want to work with their computers and AI more than people (so it would be ok if it was both computer-work AND people-work but if it's just mostly computers (even if it's really cool and lights our life up for a bit) then in the end it's spinning more money (and money's debt) instead of actually advancing the average human (which I think talking to each other in circles about our passions and 'therapy' somewhat too) does a hell of a lot more then AI.

AI of no use to humans from what we have already (each other and yes some computing). Everything else more toys and profit machines / server farms.

And we wouldn't even relax even if what you do does help people have less work... the bar would only be raised and you'd have to work harder WITH AI !

So overall the people work is skipped and we miss the whole point of "PROBLEMS" (WHICH IS HUMANS EITHER AS BASTARDS OR IDIOTS/HAVING OTHER FOCUSES).

People miss the whole point IF they think AI can save people when we need to ask humans to do it (whatever it is)... and also to save themselves but not using #AI all in / if at all.

P.S
I mean the new complex AI, the old AI or a paint program assistant / picture filter is much less of a footprint and risk...

#AI work vs #People #Work by #Admins

We have to improve people first or mostly in our work, else we get massive imbalances.