Science people to improve the human interaction work as well...?
THIS IS THE SHORT VERSION;
PLEASE COMMENT WHAT YOU THINK BEFORE LONG VERSION COMES OUT IN A FEW HOURS - THIS MIGHT BE CLEARER OR GOOD PREP)
⬇️ MY MAIN MESSAGE SUPPORTED BY THIS QUOTE : ⬇️
" I’ve seen many prominent computer scientists whose theories about general intelligence just don’t make sense. "
- Sarah Constantin
A mathematician,
Data Scientist, Machine Learning and "I'm interested in questions related to “how do we know what we think we know?” This touches on machine learning, cognitive science, and philosophy. "
================
Sarah continues...
================
"People who excel at the sit-down-and-execute activities that help you succeed in your field aren’t necessarily going to be able to reason about the weirdness of a changing world."
"(I agreed that the ability to “philosophize” well seems to be much rarer than the ability to execute well; I’ve seen many prominent computer scientists whose theories about general intelligence just don’t make sense.)"
"So the speculative, philosophical, imaginative stuff that comes before sitting down and executing is important for success, important for humanity, and maybe something we can learn to do better. John certainly thinks so, and wants the rationality community to be a sort of laboratory or nursery for these ideas."
MY COMMENT - I hope you got an intro to what I mean... more coming but feel free to say what you feel as I think sometimes Data Scientist or other people simply "will never get it" or "why to make all our work the 'people work' meanwhile in whatever field?" 
.
So I'm glad to find Sarah there who is into all that but understand we need to do something more than only that or what our jobs have incentivized us deliberately by design (and not the other stuff).
