#AI for me is about the same humans doing more iressponbile things svident already... at more cost of the environment and messing with the planet and it's people by unknown far-away people...
#AI for me is about
1/ the trust of Humans
and if they are running the same show we see now or #shitshow (doing bad work).
2/ we save energy if we preserve the computational #energy and even save installing all the hardware! Like near-0 cost!
============
Overall
============
Giving bad people even good tools is not great. More for them to F-up.
Some questions are hard to answer and that might be a problem with authority in general. But I think history makes that case closed not to give states and banks any more.
Generally machines might be said as doing good and bad / might work faster and that worries me more than humans doing so-so or just ok
(so least of worst cases and trust Bad Humans more than [Bad Humans + More tools to mess with]
===========
AI Hardware
===========
The installation / change of environments surely creates more problems and change for people and that is what humans could / should do slower and preserve their own dignity in work (and having work) and not expending the computational energy and or installing all the hardware for unknown gains / always questionable reasons.
=================
Questions about clever machines + far away people'
Q1 ❓ What are the humans doing before, during and after AI use?
Q2 ❓ What is the AI doing before, during and after human use?
=================
Other points
=================
⚠️ Machines could be said to avoid human responsibility - so while are can generally be bad, machines are much faster and silent about it (people can be #whistleblowers)
⚠️ Humans with tools need less human effort to do more bad quicker...
⚠️ AI might not be advertised as a replacement for human intelligence, but with #machines probably is naturally is I think historically - leaving peopel without #meaning in #life.
==================
Other problems or ways of saying it:
==================
➡️ acceleration of resources and for increasingly questionable gains in work.
Probably we are over-consuming lots of normal or not-need stuff.
➡️ To give AI to people might be for something too small, unneeded but then act as if it's needed only to scrutentise and police it as a human 'error' or problem.
➡️ AI work will be hard to question or see. Where is it?
Who is running it? #CCTV cameras...
➡️ Hard to stop even if it is seen as unwanted.
===========
Summary:
===========
If AI technology is generally defined as "that can automate and simulate parts of human knowledge and ability:
then I might conclude:
We don't need people to do the same bad purposes more often as we've seen before even with good technology (tracking and adverts for example) as they often do bad work / use it for the bad.
Money / profit / power/ centralisation included.