Follow

#AI for me is about the same humans doing more iressponbile things svident already... at more cost of the environment and messing with the planet and it's people by unknown far-away people... 

for me is about

1/ the trust of Humans
and if they are running the same show we see now or (doing bad work).

2/ we save energy if we preserve the computational and even save installing all the hardware! Like near-0 cost!

============
Overall
============
Giving bad people even good tools is not great. More for them to F-up.

Some questions are hard to answer and that might be a problem with authority in general. But I think history makes that case closed not to give states and banks any more.

Generally machines might be said as doing good and bad / might work faster and that worries me more than humans doing so-so or just ok

(so least of worst cases and trust Bad Humans more than [Bad Humans + More tools to mess with]

===========
AI Hardware
===========
The installation / change of environments surely creates more problems and change for people and that is what humans could / should do slower and preserve their own dignity in work (and having work) and not expending the computational energy and or installing all the hardware for unknown gains / always questionable reasons.

=================

Questions about clever machines + far away people'

Q1 ❓ What are the humans doing before, during and after AI use?

Q2 ❓ What is the AI doing before, during and after human use?

=================
Other points
=================

⚠️ Machines could be said to avoid human responsibility - so while are can generally be bad, machines are much faster and silent about it (people can be )

⚠️ Humans with tools need less human effort to do more bad quicker...

⚠️ AI might not be advertised as a replacement for human intelligence, but with probably is naturally is I think historically - leaving peopel without in .

==================
Other problems or ways of saying it:
==================

➡️ acceleration of resources and for increasingly questionable gains in work.

Probably we are over-consuming lots of normal or not-need stuff.

➡️ To give AI to people might be for something too small, unneeded but then act as if it's needed only to scrutentise and police it as a human 'error' or problem.

➡️ AI work will be hard to question or see. Where is it?
Who is running it? cameras...

➡️ Hard to stop even if it is seen as unwanted.

===========
Summary:
===========

If AI technology is generally defined as "that can automate and simulate parts of human knowledge and ability:

then I might conclude:

We don't need people to do the same bad purposes more often as we've seen before even with good technology (tracking and adverts for example) as they often do bad work / use it for the bad.

Money / profit / power/ centralisation included.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.