Wikipedia = a good source of reference even if not perfect - What do you think?
@corruptian@mastodon.cloud Another post with more opinion and not much as specific or backup to #reasoning.
But I respect your #opinion.
Maybe to finish here in something different to more of the same, try to balance your opinion with something a bit more concrete / #specific or personally clear, like ...
❓ ➡️ Point to some better examples / sites please?
❓ ➡️ Say why you care about #searchengines so much or if Wikipedia is top since that's how people find the homepages which sometimes don't do well to get top or want to play into #Google / etc #monopoly etc (they let Wikipedia etc do the work for them)
❓ ➡️ Say how it impacts your own life directly
❓ ➡️ How do you #measure #Wikipedia as an authority?
Yes some might treat it as a definitive source or #bible of #knowledge but it can be refuted or #discussed based on the #source of each #sentence (almost each is attributed to somewhere else).
But just opinions will mostly not be clear to as to what bits you mean and where it can be better etc... while accepting nothing should be considered that perfect but general guide if you're looking for things of #fact and #reference with #links to more elsewhere...