I’m convinced we relegate “arts and crafts” and manipulatives to lower grades & don’t give older students a chance to interact with these activities enough just to seem “advanced”
that notion that in k12 “advanced math” looks like taking notes not glue & paper & art.
If you feel like you “don’t have time” think about what will have more of a lasting impact. What will they remember in 10 years? You doing the proof from the book? or trying to make an ellipse by slicing a cone made of clay?
@futurebird I went to an elementary school that heavily emphasized arts and crafts, which was torture for me because I have always struggled to do tasks with my hands where precision matters.
I was so happy to largely leave arts and crafts behind after that, and I think incorporating it into math class probably would have been enough to turn me off the subject.
I do think that physical models can be really illuminating, that much more when they're interactive, but constructing such models can be really difficult/frustrating for some students (not sure what proportion).
But what if encountering arts and craft in a mathematical context instead helped you to understand art?
When we make things in my class it's not like making something in an art class, how it looks, the skill isn't as important as the meaning and process.
When we study proportions we work with perspective and projections. One student who hated drawing decided to make her drawings using turtle in python.
@futurebird Well, as far as I can tell, in my specific case (which may be quite unusual for all I know) it's less a question of understanding than the ability to physically execute on that understanding.
I think if the utility of the things you're making depends on the precision with which you make them, that's where someone like me would struggle. But as you said, using software is always an option, as is constructing things from modular pieces, where no free-hand precision is required.
As an example of the latter, when learning non-Euclidean geometry, I think that polyhedra can be a good stepping stone to thinking about smooth surfaces (e.g. Euler number), and having physical models could be really helpful. You could imagine, for example, cutting out paper polygons and building polyhedra, but someone like me would struggle to cut straight sides and the proper angles (which then messes things up when you try to get the polyhedron to close on itself properly). However, a colleague had a set of magnetic building pieces (magnetic cylinders and ferromagnetic ball bearings) that could be naturally pieced together to form polygons, so with that I was able to build every platonic solid in no time. It worked fine for me because it didn't depend on the fine accuracy of placement. So even for people like me, it is possible.
I only commented because I know for many people arts and crafts are a happy carefree space, and they may forget that there are also people who view them with as much fear and loathing as some people have for math.
