Memetic weapon of the left, cultural discourse.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/oM7cWuQax4k3GEHHX/on-memetic-weapons
This seems correct to me (self-policing part especially, I'm somewhat guilty of this myself). Hope we'll be able to foster open discussions here.
@ketil I'm not oriented on war of drugs topic enough to judge if it's conspiration-theoretical-ish or not, but it's there just to highlight tension between worries, it could have been any other belief.
I don't necessarily think that discourse is about what you are - it's more that holding certain beliefs will get you categorized as a member of outgroup during a discussion, not before it.
Regardless of this, the point still stands: ignoring members of outgroup - especially just by throwing "you're racist/sexist/etc" at them - is detrimental to the health of any discussion. It's not helpful in changing anyone's mind, just reinforces the divide between groups.
I don't know what to do about this, but it's worrying at least. We have to be able to hold discussions with outgroup without regressing to discussion-edning one liners.
@irregular
I think the point is that many people don't want a rational argument to clarify how the world is, or what peoples beliefs are. People want an irrational argument to reinforce their social group.
I think the only thing you can do is to ignore them. I have never learned anything from anybody wh argued by calling people they disagree with for fascists (or any other -ism, for that matter). There are greener pastures elsewhere.